Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't personally write the software stack on your devices, at some point you have to trust a third party.
Agreed, but surely you see a difference between an open source implementation that is out for audit by anyone, and a closed source implementation that is kept under lock & key? They could both be compromised intentionally or unintentionally, but IMHO one shows a lot more good faith than the other.
Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
211–220 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What is happening, is that people make tradeoffs, and decide to what degree they trust who and what they interact with. People aren't making tradeoffs - that's the problem. Apple is making the tradeoffs for them, and then retroactively asking their users "is this okay?" Users shouldn't need to buy a new phone to circumevent arbitrary restrictions on the hardware that is their legal property. If America had function…
They can just not enable the feature if they don't want this?
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
> letting the feds see every time you use the product This does not happen.
Wrong. Anything that makes any network request is by definition a privacy leak. The network itself is always listening, and the act of making any connection says that you are using the computer, and where, and when.
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#214Another setting that surprised me with being turned on by default apparently on macOS 15 is System Settings - Spotlight - "Help Apple Improve Search": "Help improve Search by allowing Apple to store your Safari, Siri, Spotlight, Lookup, and #images search queries. The information collected is stored in a way that does not identify you and is used to improve search results."
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#215It sounds like Apple implemented a feature and went out of the way to preserve privacy. For most users the correct choice here is to enable the feature by default.
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#216Why does Apple keep insisting that I want anything to do with them after I bought the device? Let go of the freaking tether. And let me choose my own photo editing service provider.
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#217Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#218"I don't understand most of the technical details of Apple's blog post" I do: - Client side vectorization: the photo is processed locally, preparing a non-reversible vector representation before sending (think semantic hash). - Differential privacy: a decent amount of noise is added the the vector before sending it. Enough to make it impossible to reverse lookup the vector. The noise level here is ε = 0.8, which is q…
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#219This whole thing is reminding me of the outrage over Apple and Google's privacy preserving 'Exposure Notification System' system from the Covid years. It defies intuition that they can alert you to exposure without also tracking you, but indeed that's what the technology lets you do. Similarly here, it feels like the author is leaning into a knee jerk reaction about invasion of privacy without really trying to evalua…
Someone reply with a link to the source code so I can see exactly what it is doing, without having to take an internet rando's word for it.
Better yet, let me compile it myself.
Re: Apple Photos phones home on iOS 18 and macOS 15
#220So basically - You take a picture. Apple encrypts it and uploads it to their server. The server matches the (still encrypted) picture to a database and tells your device "this picture contains the Eiffel Tower". Later when you search for Eiffel Tower on your device the photo pops up. Is the complexity and security risk really worth it for such a niche feature? It's also funny that Apple is simultaneously saying "don'…
Is this a niche feature? I use this kind of search very often in my photos.
How many landmarks are there to justify sending your data off? Can't the database be stored on the device?