141–150 of 162 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it comparable with OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s models? I have a strong resistance towards using Musk‘s products nowadays, but maybe I should take a look over the fence.
Why do you strongly resist products by Musk? He runs highly competent firms.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If nobody minds a plug: My own product, StatusGator, which was launched here on HackerNews 10 year ago, notifies IT teams about outages before they are acknowledged by official status pages. - This OpenAI outage[1] we notified 4 minutes before they acknowledged. - The last AWS outage[2], we notified 28 minutes before they acknowledged - There is def an Azure outage[3] now yet they have still not updated their status…
Btw, tried to sign up and got a message that it would send me an email to confirm my login. Instead what I received was an email pointing me to a video demo. Not sure if simply clicking on that link was enough to confirm my email. That’s outside of a normal workflow.
Looks like Azure is experiencing a major outage, but I cannot find anything about it. If you look at downdetector.com you'll notice reported outages from OpenAI, Microsoft 365, XBox Live, Walmart, the list goes on.
Status page is updated now: https://azure.status.microsoft/ >Impact Statement: Starting at 18:44 UTC on 26 Dec 2024, you have been identified as a customer who was impacted by a power incident in South Central US and may experience a degraded experience. >Current Status: There was a power incident in the South Central US AZ03 which affected multiple services. We have applied mitigation and are actively validating rec…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a delusional world you live in where you think I was making that argument. So you have no problem with him abusing his kid in public, because child abuse is ok as long as you don't actually murder them? Edit: So abusing your kid in public isn't evil? You're fine with that, as long as he doesn't kill them? Isn't it also evil for you to defend Musk's child abuse? Again, you're missing the point that your valid cri…
I'm making the simple point that Google is far less moral. Which is why they removed the "don't be evil" from their moto.
You're still purposefully ignoring and refusing to acknowledge my point that your valid criticism actually reinforces his point of how vile, unethical, and evil Elon Musk is.
You're also ignoring the point that another poster, a Google employee, wrote that Google pulled out of Project Maven due to employee protests, but Amazon and Microsoft didn't. And I'd bet you anything that Musk would gladly accept such evil government contracts for the right amount of money. He already does, in fact.
Please answer my question, if you're not afraid to: So abusing your kid in public isn't evil, public humiliation and verbal abuse is fine parenting, but you draw the line at murder?
So do you agree with the [flagged] [dead] comments of other idiotic hateful transphobic homophobic Musk fan-boys in this thread who are parroting and amplifying Musk's abuse against his own child?
Those [flagged] [dead] posts are incontrovertible proof that Musk's public abuse of his own child actually encourages other people to pile on and abuse her too, as well as many many other trans and LGBTQ people. And they don't stop at Musk's daughter, and the don't stop at verbal abuse: they physically assault and even rape trans people, because people like Musk encourage in incite them to hate and assault the same people he does, including but certainly not limited to his own daughter.
Go to your user use page at https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=llm_trw , then select showdead: true, then come back to this thread and read the [flagged] [dead] comments, then tell me if you agree with them and Musk, and that's whose side you want to support in this debate. Or just don't reply if you're too embarrassed and cowardly to admit it.
Do you really want to use an LLM pre-loaded with Musk's hatred and abuse? And are you actually naive enough to think he wouldn't do that, since he bought Twitter for the express purpose of shoving his opinions down everyone's throat?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Power outage seems really odd. Don't datacenters usually have multiple redundant power supplies + on-site backup power generation? Maybe power "incident" mean something else?
The switching equipment can fail. Had this happen at a DC where the switching equipment arc flashed when going from mains to diesel generators. The switching equipment detected the arc and then locked out until someone onsite could inspect the equipment and override it. The rack UPSes only lasted like 5 minutes and then everything went dark.
derecho storms hammered the area and killed power. external power lines in failed, and the ATS hung or died when switching to the N+1 diesel generators.
since it never got switched to diesel, the UPS systems kept things going for the standard interval (e.g. ~3-5 minutes) and then ran out of power, and then everything went down. AWS died and IIRC it took a lot of stuff with it, most notably reddit, etc.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assumed this kind of thing would be automated lol
Coming from the MS side, they can automate anything if they wanted to. The only blocker is how outages affect reputation. There is incentive to be transparent since customers will notice big outrages and post about them online, but there's no incentive to be fully transparent.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm making the simple point that Google is far less moral. Which is why they removed the "don't be evil" from their moto.
Well? You're still purposefully ignoring and refusing to acknowledge my point that your valid criticism actually reinforces his point of how vile, unethical, and evil Elon Musk is. You're also ignoring the point that another poster, a Google employee, wrote that Google pulled out of Project Maven due to employee protests, but Amazon and Microsoft didn't. And I'd bet you anything that Musk would gladly accept such evi…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.scribbr.com/ai-detector/ says 0% chance.
The post was definitely not AI sourced; underlying thoughts are original and possibly it’s been touched up afterwards. But this is 100% the style of ChatGPT, I would bet a lot on it. It wasn’t an accusation (I don’t think it actually matters in the end), so much as to understand why do it — in a post about ChatGPT usage, it helps understand context: if OP values using it for stuff I wouldn’t value using it for, for e…