Live data from Hacker News

Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

github.com

141–150 of 311 posts

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#141
I use mpd and ncmpcpp but arguably I don't need much in terms of features, I just play all the things on shuffle.

No point in using my phone as when I'm on the LAN, I don't need it, and when I'm out of it, it's counter productive to connect to it (because Canada still has third world mobile data rates) and better off replicating the entire library on-device.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#142
post #84
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not OP, but gonic is very lightweight and takes little resources. It lives on a machine that serves a few websites and also hosts my photos with photoprism (by far the most resource intensive service on this server). It's a basic N100 machine with 8GB RAM. As for my music, although I own a physical copy of most of it that I bought legally, I downloaded almost everything through bittorrent as is easier than ripping CD…

Yep. Same with Plex. I used to run it with 1.2 GHz dual core Intel Atom. I always encode to 128 kbps Opus when I stream my music and I'm not on Wi-Fi. It took about 300-500ms until the music started when I pressed play. The CPU usage was very low even when actively encoding. The only thing that takes a bit more of CPU is if you have a huge music collection (I have about 2.5 TB), and you do the first metadata and albu…

    > Otherwise you can run these systems with a potato.
Crikey: This gave me a laugh like none other in a while. For anyone else who doesn't get the reference, you can build a very basic battery from a potato, e.g., https://stemgeneration.org/potato-power/

Now, I would love to see a YouTube video where someone tries to power a portable music player from a battery. Could a PiZero be done?

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The algorithms have never introduced me to a new song. They always try to mash up things I've heard before, which is disappointing because I can often go to "similar artists" in Spotify and after drilling down a couple of levels, find new artists. But Spotify will never suggest it until I listen to a song at least once and even then it will only recommended that one song. I still do most of my discovery by looking at…

What used to work for me was the "recommended" section under a playlist, as well as the discover weekly. I say "used to" because I haven't actually used to those in a long time for unrelated reasons. The drawbacks to these is that they require time to go through them. AFAIK, the "automatically continue playing" feature doesn't pick from the recommended section, and it's hit and mostly miss. Furthermore, to use that s…

You can sort of achieve that the other way around by starting an incognito session when you put on background music. Haven't worked out how to do that for things with Spotify integrations though.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#144
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OK, I will ask. I presume you purchased all those music files that you host on that certain server, didn’t you? I will also assume that there is no tool that lets you acquire music MP3s (or some appropriate file type which is non-audiophile listenable) the Linux ISO way (without having to hunt them songs one by one), right? I am talking about someone already having a Spotify/apple music playlists/likes/favourites. Al…

>OK, I will ask. I presume you purchased all those music files that you host on that certain server, didn’t you? I self-host my music streaming with Plex, and I'll go ahead and admit to you that no -- not all of my music is paid for. >Also, these self hosted music services mean — no new music reco/discover, right? I've discovered more music, and more interesting music, through my Plex server in 6 months than I have o…

Sounds like an interesting website. Would you mind sharing the link? Asking for a friend.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#145

Large microsd cards are very cheap these days. Using all this cloud stuff seems like a waste of multiple resources. And if you ever don't have a good connection then it's worthless. I've given stuff like this a try and only found it worth it on internal networks.

Syncthing and local files are a much better strategy. Internet access is just too unreliable even when its ubiquitous.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#147

People who use this or something similar (Jellyfin, Navidrome, etc.), what do you use to easily add new music? Ideally I'd like to automate this to the point where I can look up an album and it gets downloaded automatically, similar to how Overseerr[1] works for movies and series but without the dependency on Plex. [1] https://github.com/sct/overseerr

I use Funkwhale, which exposes a nice web UI for uploading new music. Saves me the hassle of manually adding music files to a server, and it also allows for a multi-user setup where users can keep some music to themselves.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#148

Hmm.. I have a different use case. There are 7 years of a radio show with daily recordings of about 2-3 hours in length, including images. About 400GB in size. It used to all be hosted on a heavily ad plastered Drupal site, but I took it down a few years ago, because reasons. I would like to make the archive available to the public, it would be such a waste to delete it. When I write available, I mean via a website.…

Funkwhale should support this. You might even be able to set up the show to present itself as a podcast.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#149
post #86
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Self hosted music service doesn't necessarily imply new music discovery problems, because a lot of people still discover music the old non-algorithmic way, by being interested in certain genres, studying labels and artists and going through their albums, adding to their collection what they would love to hear again. Buying and owning the song/album somehow brings me more satisfaction than paying a monthly fee for a s…

Back in the days, there was a service called what.cd, which was really nice for music discovery. You had very dedicated music fans, great forums and a daily top 10 of most downloaded music. For many it was the fastest way of finding new interesting stuff. I've heard rumors this kind of services still exist, but we never know if it's just an urban legend.

IMO the best places to find music at the moment other than friends are record stores, Bandcamp, and slsk.

I've found some decent stuff due to streaming services and algorithms but it's just so lazy and convenient.

Re: Blackcandy: Self hosted music streaming server

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAICT navidrome doesn't organize anything itself. In your config file, you just say: MusicFolder = "/home/vlad/music" And you're off to the races. The docs even say that this can be a read-only folder, which it is in my case.

On the main docs page it says: > Navidrome does not support browsing by folders, but simulates it based on the tags with a structure like: /AlbumArtist/Album/01-Song.ext I don't think I have seen this tag simulation when I tried it around 2 years ago. But in any case, is this good enough? And does it recognize artists and songs from MusicBrainz like Jelly does flowlessly?

For Musicbrainz I use beets to import/organise the songs into my library directory structure.

For stuff not on mb I use fb2k as it has a fairly decent tagger and move it to the local external drive, which is synced to the server.

At home I usually just use fb2k to play to my sound system via an interface, and on the go I use play:Sub connected to the navidrome instance transcoded to 160k OPUS (initially over tailscale but now via portforward/cloudflare and soon cloudflare tunnel)

Post reply on HN