Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
forgottenweapons.com
Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamba_Pistol
Link is from here: https://www.forgottenweapons.com/the-end-of-the-mamba-a-tale...
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#3Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#4Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#5Interesting, but what's the intended takeaway, other than "Hardware is hard?"
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#6Interesting, but what's the intended takeaway, other than "Hardware is hard?"
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#7Interesting, but what's the intended takeaway, other than "Hardware is hard?"
Management and communication is evidently quite a bit harder.
There was a philosophical difference in manufacturing between the US and UK through WWII. In the UK, it was considered normal to have workbenches with people using files to touch up parts that didn't fit. In Detroit, parts that didn't fit were rejects, and discarded. The classic Detroit tester is a go/no go gauge.[1] This allowed assembly by low-skill workers. In the transcript of the meeting, you can read the argument between people from those different mindsets.
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#8A bit of background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamba_Pistol Link is from here: https://www.forgottenweapons.com/the-end-of-the-mamba-a-tale...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mamba_Pistol&diff...
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#9A bit of background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamba_Pistol Link is from here: https://www.forgottenweapons.com/the-end-of-the-mamba-a-tale...
Re: Minutes of a Meeting Held at Gear Ratio on Tuesday 13 June 78 [pdf]
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Management and communication is evidently quite a bit harder.
This is from the paper drawing era. One reason that AutoCAD was such a success was that, at last, you could ship editable drawings to others. You could be sure the dimensions totaled properly, since dimensions were derived from coordinates. This project ran into both problems - a supplier had drawings which disagreed with the company doing the assembly, and changes made in one part of the operation didn't propagate b…