Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
horsesaysinternet.com
Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
1–10 of 51 posts
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#2Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#3Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#4It's a classic university commercialization effort:take ip from university for some important problem, integrate it together and give it a commercial appeal, and sell.
But it's not as easy as writing some crud site.
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#5(So alpha-geek pissing matches are clearly a waste. Everything should be focused towards furthering your company's goals while avoiding bugs and making refactoring easier.)
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#6Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#7Be real with yourself: Cleverness is a finite resource, even yours. Leverage it in the most efficient way possible. (So alpha-geek pissing matches are clearly a waste. Everything should be focused towards furthering your company's goals while avoiding bugs and making refactoring easier.)
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#8Be real with yourself: Cleverness is a finite resource, even yours. Leverage it in the most efficient way possible. (So alpha-geek pissing matches are clearly a waste. Everything should be focused towards furthering your company's goals while avoiding bugs and making refactoring easier.)
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#9Is there a really a debate or am I missing something? This is honestly the first thing I have seen supporting not solving a problem.
Really I think there is a place for both. He mentions avoiding the problem of search, which happened to be the foundation of a particularly successful company.
Re: Marc Andreessen “tried really hard not to invent anything new”
#10There’s an ongoing debate about whether startups should focus on harder problems. Is there a really a debate or am I missing something? This is honestly the first thing I have seen supporting not solving a problem. Really I think there is a place for both. He mentions avoiding the problem of search, which happened to be the foundation of a particularly successful company.
There is, but the sense is that things have shifted out of proportion.