Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot is now available for free

github.com

101–110 of 412 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#101

Working with people who use this stuff a lot has made my current job just so so much harder in every way its astonishing. I used to solve problems with code, now I feel like hermeneut or dream analyzer: absent of human intention, codebases quickly become these weird piles of different idioms, even without considering the hallucinations (those have definitely cost me a few sleepless nights now either way). But I am ju…

Wait a bit, it won't last

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#104
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The actual killer feature for me is the much superior autocompletion, Cursor always suggests an edit inline once I stopped typing, without having me to type a prompt to ask it to do stuff. And it feels faster than GH Copilot, too. For us who prefer coding ourselves (instead of telling LLMs to do stuff and review the result) it is much much better.

But Copilot does exactly the same? You don't need to prompt anything.

Exactly. This is how it works in vim/nvim using the copilot.vim plugin. Unless it's refactoring multiple files, I don't see the value. Now that you can choose your own model, I don't see many benefits with Cursor.

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#105
I like the mediocrity of the example they headlined: the user asks for unit tests. Copilot writes only two test cases, so not exactly great coverage. Plus, the test cases uses python's unittest, which isn't as slick as pytest.

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. I believe AI is detrimental. It makes us go too fast. It's all about production now, pure efficiency over individuals. 2. AI is too dangerous. Whatever innovations used for benign applications will be eventually used for more dangerous applications such as advanced genetic engineering and the military. 3. AI uses too much energy. It's disrespectful to the resources that we have. 4. AI is an apex technology amongst…

Thank you for your reply. I am currently having a ride with chatgpt allowing me to write applications at 3 times the speed compared to before (where before may be "never" for some technologies) and I am happy for everyone contributing to this. But all your points are well grounded, I will have to figure out a way to think about them, while keeping my day job.

ChatBLT and Copilot break every license of every repo they were trained on. Even the most liberal project license states you have to include, and not modify, the license file. So you’re glad for code thieves. Interesting…

So to give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re not just another dude who has hitched their financial wagon to this current AI slopfest, I just retried a question about writing OSSEC rules and the response, while convincing looking, was completely wrong. Again.

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#107

Is there some way to check what I currently use? I rarely use chat, so 50 per month probably wouldn't be an issue, but completion has become my main completion tool, not sure if I'd stay under 2000..

Came here to ask the same question. I bet I have 2000+ code completions in a single, fevered, Mountain Dew fueled day of coding, which would be my quota for a month of the free tier.

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#109
post #5

I ditched Copilot for Cursor and never looked back. Cursor might be the only other AI product with product market fit than ChatGPT, it's that good

Has anyone who uses an IDE (e.g., JetBrains, not a code editor) moved to Cursor? I've downloaded it a few times because everyone raves about it, but I've always come back almost immediately because editors can't reliably make changes across projects (among many other things)... What am I missing? FWIW I use GoLand w/ Supermaven, currently.

Tried to move from JetBrains to VS Code with new Copilot Edit mode. Moved back to JetBrains and horribly outdated copy paste workflow ... for now. Disruption is imminent though. (And yes JetBrains AI integration got better but the 'insert code at cursor option' is laughable. There is a command to generate code right in the editor too, but not from chat. Also $10 extra. )

PS: One UI feature that I haven't seen anywhere yet is not splitting the screen into code and chat but unifying it.

Also a common approach (e.g. in openai composer) seems to be to modify the file line by line which takes a very long time if the file is long, which (agentic) tools use a diff approach instead?

Re: GitHub Copilot is now available for free

#110
post #105

I like the mediocrity of the example they headlined: the user asks for unit tests. Copilot writes only two test cases, so not exactly great coverage. Plus, the test cases uses python's unittest, which isn't as slick as pytest.

I use Copilot a lot for writing specs. I've come to prefer that it only writes one or two specs to start. It's a good way for me to quickly review it has the structure correct. When it throws too many at me at once, it can be harder to make broad tweaks.

As for `pytest`, I just have to remind it I'm using pytest. "Write pytests for this" is sufficient to get it to do what I want.

Post reply on HN