Live data from Hacker News

Updates to H-1B

uscis.gov

281–290 of 1001 posts

Re: Updates to H-1B

#282
I wish USCIS was very strict about those guys who is coming in H1b from India incapable of doing anything and hire guy from india to do all their work.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#283
post #68

It’s never been clear to me why this program exists in the first place, other than to put downward pressure on US STEM wages. What am I missing?

The program exists to brain drain other countries of talent. It's very successful at that.

65k or 80k or say even 250k GLOBALLY per year is going to “brain drain” 8+ billion Global population? Yup, you got it, that’s what US is doing…

Re: Updates to H-1B

#284
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The per-country caps also seem like a throwback to the early 1900's era immigration exclusion policies. Canada does not have that and it is going very poorly. Lots of people are calling for the implementation of the same policy.

How is not having a per-country cap going poorly in Canada?

Because there are an overwhelming number of immigrants from the same state (or two) in India.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#285
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

When I was in the US with visas for my four-person family, we FedExed our passports to Finland where my parents put them in a different envelope and mailed them to the US embassy. Ten days later the embassy mailed back the passports with the new visas attached, and my parents FedExed them back to us in New York. Yeah, seems like this re-approval concept makes a ton of sense. FedEx at least got some business.

As someone else has said, this isn't legal. I hope you don't publicize the actions you took.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#286

Seem like sensible changes, though more is still needed. Requiring H1B holders to leave the country to renew paperwork is an insane anachronism. The per-country caps also seem like a throwback to the early 1900's era immigration exclusion policies. Re: the concerns over "immigrants taking our jobs!". As a native-born American working in a large tech company today - the threat is very clearly not from H1B's and other…

The per-country caps is very important. Otherwise, you will see flood of same people which makes everything biased.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#287

Seem like sensible changes, though more is still needed. Requiring H1B holders to leave the country to renew paperwork is an insane anachronism. The per-country caps also seem like a throwback to the early 1900's era immigration exclusion policies. Re: the concerns over "immigrants taking our jobs!". As a native-born American working in a large tech company today - the threat is very clearly not from H1B's and other…

[flagged]

You don't have to leave the country to renew your H-1B status. As long as you stay in the US and have a legitimate reason, you can keep renewing the status. Some have done that for 20+ years while waiting for their green card priority date.

But if you leave the country for any reason and your entry visa has expired, you have to apply for a new visa to be allowed to return. And you often have to return to your home country to do that. Which can be inconvenient, as it can turn a short vacation or conference trip to a month-long stay in another country. And for citizens of some countries, there is a high risk of denial. Visiting your family can then leave you stranded in a country that's no longer your home, while being locked out of your actual home and life in the US.

This is a peculiar feature of the US system. In most countries, when you renew your temporary work permit (whatever it's called), you also renew you entry permit.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#288
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if this shortage has to do with the recent strong swing back to in-office work

Well, what is a company supposed to do if local candidates do not want RTO? It seems logical to hire workers who are OK with RTO, especially if they are outside of the country and clearly willing to relocate for RTO.

>Well, what is a company supposed to do if local candidates do not want RTO?

Well one option, of course, would be not forcing staff to return to office.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US is only 4% of the world's population, so there's an enormous number of extremely smart people who live outside its present borders. I don't think anyone believes that even the world's greatest educational system can bring all of its students up to an extremely high level of general intelligence. We should be letting very smart people born outside the US emigrate here, which is a win-win for everyone involved

Sure. But the government of the United States is, allegedly, there for the benefit of its citizens. I'm not really following where this "should" comes from. "Should" in what volume? "Should" over what time frame?

If you don't think that having Linus Torvalds as a US citizen tremendously benefits the US public as a whole, enough to offset any imagined downsides of a great many merely average immigrating tech workers, there's nothing more to be said. And that's just him alone but he is merely one example of many other famous examples.

Re: Updates to H-1B

#290
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

When I was in the US with visas for my four-person family, we FedExed our passports to Finland where my parents put them in a different envelope and mailed them to the US embassy. Ten days later the embassy mailed back the passports with the new visas attached, and my parents FedExed them back to us in New York. Yeah, seems like this re-approval concept makes a ton of sense. FedEx at least got some business.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN