Live data from Hacker News

1-800-ChatGPT

help.openai.com

141–150 of 350 posts

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#141
post #5

100% shipped to show off to family during Christmas. I'll definitely give it a go, I wonder if this lands better with those aged 50+ who are more used to phone calls rather than chat.

You're surely right that they anticipate it being be a novelty that people share during holiday visits.

But as you can probably tell from the other replies, the idea that older people don't know how to use internet-era technology is a meme that was wearing thin 20 years ago already.

People who haven't had ChatGPT "land" for them yet are likely just people who don't find themselves asking a lot of questions they need a chatbot to answer, regardless of the medium. That probably has some age skew right now, but isn't really about the medium at all.

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Controversial take: LLMs are the first time in a while that I have felt like emerging technology trends is doing something cool and adding value. For the past 8-10 years it has all felt like a bunch of apps that just aim to be mediocre middlemen/gig economy brokers with bad customer service.

> a bunch of apps that just aim to be mediocre middlemen/gig economy brokers with bad customer service Isn't this the new LLM playbook?

How so?

I pay Claude/ChatGPT trivial amounts of money for metered API access to their models, and they in turn provide it to me.

Middlemen/marketplace models like "Uber for x" or "Etsy for x" or "Betterhelp for x" is a totally different business model.

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#144
OMG! Try calling from Microsoft Teams :D You will end up with, "Thanks for calling Agenta". Did OpenAI outsource and release this implementation with some of the company's internal phone numbers?

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#145
In addition to GOOG-411, this brings back memories of ChaCha search via SMS.

You could text a question to CHA-CHA (242-242) and someone would google it for you as a human search engine!

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree about an abundance of apps, but what type of value are LLMs adding? It can sometimes be useful to input a more "human" search and have something get spit out but 60% of the time it completely lies to you. I'm talking about questions related to web specifications which are public documents. Section numbers, standards names, etc.. will be completely made up.

> but 60% of the time it completely lies to you This is such an exhausting conversation

i think when people say things like this it indicates that they tried LLMs in 2022 and solidified their opinion there.

I had the same impression about the hallucinations 2 years ago. The reality is in at the end of 2024, you can get incredible value from LLMs.

I've used copilot to code almost exclusively now for the past few months. Anyone still comparing it to text completion I feel is operating on completely out of date information either intentionally or unintentionally.

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#148

It's funny, I asked it what model it is, and it replies: > am based on OpenAI's GPT-4 model. Specifically, you are interacting with an instance of GPT-4, which is designed to understand and generate human-like text based on the prompts it receives. My responses are influenced by the extensive training on diverse datasets, but I do not have access to real-time data or events beyond my knowledge cutoff in January 2022.…

LLMs do not know about their own capabilites because it's not in the training data obviously.

I didn't even ask for it. I just asked what version it is. The cutoff date was completely volunteered.

Re: 1-800-ChatGPT

#150
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The value to me is by having an on-demand junior developer working alongside me for the price of $20 a month

Mine is a senior developer with memory lapses.

And that sometimes you need to bully a bit to get coerced answers out of... feels bad
Post reply on HN