1-800-ChatGPT
91–100 of 350 posts
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#92100% shipped to show off to family during Christmas. I'll definitely give it a go, I wonder if this lands better with those aged 50+ who are more used to phone calls rather than chat.
So the perception of those aged 50+, is one of people so far removed from technology they’d prefer to use a telephone to avoid their discomfort with computers? I’m well into this group and still make a lot more api calls than phone calls. Fresh out of college I recall vividly thinking, I’ll need to build an impressive list of side projects to overcome preconceptions about how much I can truly offer at my age. Maybe n…
our industry is old enough that the first generation of pioneers has died of old age.
Do you really think someone who grew up with computers in the 80s is incapable of using a smart phone? These are people who are still in the workforce today. These are your most skilled colleagues.
Some of them probably designed the device you think they're too old to understand
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#93Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#94more gimmicks than actual progress. scaling limits and intelligence barrier has definitely been hit
More likely, there are different groups of engineers working on these features. It's likely the people implementing the WhatsApp feature, are not the ones working on the LLM models.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#95Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
More likely, there are different groups of engineers working on these features. It's likely the people implementing the WhatsApp feature, are not the ones working on the LLM models.
Probably more about how they’re choosing to use resources If they believe AGI is around the corner and they are competing with others to get there, seems silly to invest resources in standing up a phone line, etc.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
o1 is way better than gpt-4 imo, feel that many people just don't have complicated tasks/questions they have to do in their day to day. it's like a half jump between 3.5 and 4 to me
That's not been my experience, though I guess it depends on what you're using o1 for. My experience is that o1 is extremely good at producing a series of logical steps for things. Ask it a simple question and it will write you what feels like an entire manual that you never asked for. For the most part I've stopped caring about integrating AI into software, but I could see o1 being good for writing prompts for anothe…
Even writing, where it is supposed to be worse than 4O, I feel that is does better/has a more solid understanding of provided documents.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#98100% shipped to show off to family during Christmas. I'll definitely give it a go, I wonder if this lands better with those aged 50+ who are more used to phone calls rather than chat.
Sonny, people in their 50s were sending smileys on their Nokias before Zuck had even thought of Facebook...
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#99Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#100Between purchasing chat.com, and this new 800 number, I sometimes feel like OpenAI is really channeling that 90s dot com era energy.
Controversial take: LLMs are the first time in a while that I have felt like emerging technology trends is doing something cool and adding value. For the past 8-10 years it has all felt like a bunch of apps that just aim to be mediocre middlemen/gig economy brokers with bad customer service.