1-800-ChatGPT
11–20 of 350 posts
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#12Between purchasing chat.com, and this new 800 number, I sometimes feel like OpenAI is really channeling that 90s dot com era energy.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#13Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#14Between purchasing chat.com, and this new 800 number, I sometimes feel like OpenAI is really channeling that 90s dot com era energy.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#15Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#16Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#17Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#18Maybe GPT-4 is the 1080p of LLMs: Noticeably better than 720p and 480p models, and not bad enough to warrant additional improvements.
Sure, 4K, 8K, ... are technologically available, but for the majority of use cases, 1080p is enough. Similarly, even though o1 and other models are technically feasible, for most cases the current models are enough.
In fact, GPT-4 is more than enough for 80% of tasks (text summarization, Apple (un)Intelligence, writing emails, tool use, etc.)—small models (<32B) are perfectly fine for those tasks (and they keep getting better too.)
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#19more gimmicks than actual progress. scaling limits and intelligence barrier has definitely been hit
It's likely the people implementing the WhatsApp feature, are not the ones working on the LLM models.
Re: 1-800-ChatGPT
#20Between purchasing chat.com, and this new 800 number, I sometimes feel like OpenAI is really channeling that 90s dot com era energy.