Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#2Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#3Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#4Ban the victims not the perpetrators (cybertruck)
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#5It would be nice if cars got more of a bonus to their safety rating based on how they won't pulp other people in an accident.
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#6Anyone who thinks that kei trucks shouldn't be on roads and highways and motorcycles should ought to have their head examined.
For the record I support both, with the exception of 3 wheel delta configuration motorcycles such as Harley's 3 wheeler. Riding one is a death wish; selling one should be a crime.
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#7Good to see this getting more attention. It's hard to make sense of a system that allows motorcycles but not kei trucks.
4 months ago on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41180154
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#8I've rambled about this on here before, but I'm pretty bothered that the media coverage of these always mentions the 25-year import law, but also always frames it simply as a matter of exemption from safety and emissions standards, never deigning to mention that the law originated in the first place as a protectionist measure.
In the late 80s, Mercedes in North America was getting its lunch eaten by grey-market importers who were bringing European models over and undercutting the American dealers on price. So they blew millions lobbying the government to crack down on these imports, and found a not-wholly-unsubstantiated justification in safety concerns around modifications not complying with American safety standards. So the US just enacted a sweeping ban of any new imports; you can bring in dodgy old cars from the 1990s unmodified, but you can't bring in a 2024 European Mercedes or Japanese kei truck, because they're "unsafe". The new cars can't be titled, and if the feds find out you got one in anyway, they'll literally confiscate it and throw it in the crusher.
Seeing Whistlindiesel in the article makes me realize that there could be a bipartisan coalition here of "government should let me do what I want" conservatives and libertarians, and urban-design lefties who resent having to drive everywhere and would love to buy the minimum amount of car possible to meet their needs if such a thing were possible. My conspiracy theory is that burying the lede on this is intentional because people buying $12,000 Japanese imports wouldn't be buying $60,000 F-150s.
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#9It would be nice if cars got more of a bonus to their safety rating based on how they won't pulp other people in an accident.
It would be nice if non-cars, like SUVs and pickups, paid more for insurance (but they pay less, because being tanks they protect their occupants even as they lay waste to everything else - unfortunately insurers care more about the former than the latter).
Re: Legal fights over kei trucks in the U.S.
#10It would be nice if cars got more of a bonus to their safety rating based on how they won't pulp other people in an accident.
It would be nice if non-cars, like SUVs and pickups, paid more for insurance (but they pay less, because being tanks they protect their occupants even as they lay waste to everything else - unfortunately insurers care more about the former than the latter).
Insurance on my 1999 Chevy pickup costs more than my 2001 Olds Intrigue.
Or at least it did a few years ago when the car was insured and on the road.