Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
491–500 of 678 posts
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#492Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't sound exactly ridiculous when Zuckerberg also admitted those same intelligence agencies pressured them into censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.
That's so absurdly far from what Zuck said it's an outright lie. "Zuckerberg told Rogan: "The background here is that the FBI came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar to that'." He said the FBI did…
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#493Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ...like saying Microsoft has no moat for spreadsheets Which would be very inaccurate as network-effects are Excel's (and Word's) moat. Excel being bundled with Office and Windows helped, but it beat Lotus-123 by being a superior product at a time the computing landscape was changing. OpenAI has no such advantage yet: a text-based API is about as commoditized as a technology can get and OpenAI is furiously launching…
> OpenAI has no such advantage yet: a text-based API is about as commoditized as a technology It has branding, for most people AI is ChatGpt. Once you reach critical mass, getting people to switch becomes difficult if your product is good enough and most people are happy.
But for things you do alone at home, this quickly goes away. Uber is a strong brand, everyone associated non-taxi taxis with Uber. When Bolt came around in much of Europe, and offered the same service with better wait times (they were paying drivers more, so lots of drivers switched), people moved over to Bolt in droves.
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#494I'm surprised by OpenAI's resilience through all this drama. It's impressive to see how far they've come from 2017 to 2024. This journey has given me a whole new appreciation for startups and the individuals behind them. Now I better understand why my own past mediocre attempts didn't succeed.
Thank you for sharing this information!
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#495Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI probably has more capacity to be incorporated into many things than microwaves.
I will bite, going with your analogy comparing to electricity on the other end of the spectrum. electricity is not ubiquitous in many parts of the global south full 130 years. The common definition is- access to electricity source that can provide very basic lighting, and charge a phone or power a radio for 4 hours per day. Not even grid connected. Even with this basic definition there is still full 660 million peopl…
So I guess it all depends on your definition of "transformative".
If a billion people are affected? 2 billion? One continent? All of them?
If something is big in Australia, Asia, Europe and North America, is that enough to describe it is "rock the world"?
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#496Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doing what exactly? What industry could Mars possibly support profitably?
Why would I need to choose just one? He’s the only person with a serious presence on the planet. He builds a landing pad that works exclusively with his rockets, and ANYTHING that happens on the planet will be going through him. Hell, he can probably convince China or the US to pay to build the habitats if he wants to.
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#497Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's so absurdly far from what Zuck said it's an outright lie. "Zuckerberg told Rogan: "The background here is that the FBI came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar to that'." He said the FBI did…
Your rebuttal is corroborating my "lies".
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#498Earlier quoted context omitted.
What were their predictions?
"we have reason to believe AGI can ultimately be built with less than $10B in hardware" "Within the next three years, robotics should be completely solved, AI should solve a long-standing unproven theorem, programming competitions should be won consistently by AIs, and there should be convincing chatbots" (2017) "We will completely solve the problem of adversarial examples by the end of August"
As a person who actually builds this infrastructure for Data Centers: Bwahaha!!!
This guy should have been laughed out of the room, and probably been out of a job if ANYONE took this guy serious. There are Elon levels of dillusions, and then there is this!
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#499Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your rebuttal is corroborating my "lies".
So to you "intelligence agencies convinced Facebook that future big stories around leaks might be Russian propaganda" is the same as "FBI pressured Facebook to take down the Biden laptop story"?
Mark admitted the source of the censorship on Rogan's podcast and again doubled down on this fact with a letter to Congress.
https://x.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1828201780544504064/photo/...
Re: Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit
#500Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's already made hundreds of billions of dollars though? A permanent Martian colony is an incredibly ambitious endeavor and even with a trillion dollars there's a reasonable chance the colony fails.
I don't think Elon is driven by money per se. I think he just wants to see expensive cool shit happen in his lifetime.