Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Htmx 2.0.4 Released

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 136 posts

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#41

Post by intalentive »

hipadev23 wrote: post #38
_heimdall wrote: post #2

> Calling htmx.ajax with no target or source now defaults to body (previously did nothing) This one jumped out to me as an interesting one for a patch release. Changing the default behavior feels like a breaking change, though hopefully there weren't sites expecting an ajax call to not do anything.

> Changing the default behavior feels like a breaking change I'm fine with breaking changes personally. An adherence to maintaining backward compatibility always is what leads to bloat and criticisms of "poor design" from HNers in the future. Keep it slim, have one way to do things, and avoid the disaster that is js and python today.

How is Python a disaster?

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#44

Post by sublinear »

xupybd wrote: post #42
sublinear wrote: post #40

[flagged]

Harsh dude, why not just keep quiet?

Sick and tired of any server-side rendering of web pages.

If you don't have to deal with incident response you can be quiet.

It doesn't scale and it complicates meeting any client requirements. Get this trash outta here. For real.

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#45

Post by xupybd »

sublinear wrote: post #44
xupybd wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Harsh dude, why not just keep quiet?

Sick and tired of any server-side rendering of web pages. If you don't have to deal with incident response you can be quiet. It doesn't scale and it complicates meeting any client requirements. Get this trash outta here. For real.

I worked with server side rendering for close to a decade. It's very reliable.

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#46

Post by thekashifmalik »

So happy every time I see HTMX.

I'm hoping there is more innovation in this space with React engineers rediscovering the benefits of server-side rendering and Backend-For-Frontend efforts.

I think the perfect stack involves all 3 paradigms (initial loads, hypermedia loads and data/AJAX loads) used in parts of the application as makes sense.

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#47

Post by sublinear »

xupybd wrote: post #45
sublinear wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sick and tired of any server-side rendering of web pages. If you don't have to deal with incident response you can be quiet. It doesn't scale and it complicates meeting any client requirements. Get this trash outta here. For real.

I worked with server side rendering for close to a decade. It's very reliable.

[flagged]

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#48

Post by xupybd »

sublinear wrote: post #47
xupybd wrote: post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I worked with server side rendering for close to a decade. It's very reliable.

[flagged]

What happens when your static stie infrastructure goes down?

I fear your argument is turtles all the way down.

Edit: I'll show this to my boss. I'm sure he'll get a chuckle.

Re: Htmx 2.0.4 Released

#49

Post by sublinear »

xupybd wrote: post #48
sublinear wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

What happens when your static stie infrastructure goes down? I fear your argument is turtles all the way down. Edit: I'll show this to my boss. I'm sure he'll get a chuckle.

I hope he does because that's a huge sign your entire management structure is super out of touch and I hope you're next DOR or incident ressponse reveals the truth.
Post reply on HN