Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

BlenderGPT

blendergpt.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 210 posts

Re: BlenderGPT

#51

Post by marcellus23 »

takinox2 wrote: post #39
bogwog wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the exact same thing, especially considering how bare bones the site/app is. It's as if someone rushed to turn that into a subscription-based app as quickly as possible. I wouldn't even be surprised if the app itself was AI generated!

[flagged]

Kind of odd that you made your account just now and all you've done is respond vehemently to criticism of this website.

Re: BlenderGPT

#54

Post by isaacimagine »

para_parolu wrote: post #52
cbartlett wrote: post #48

Blender is a registered trademark, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with blender. I'm not sure GPT is safe or even correct either.

Bestbuy is full of equipment with Blender in name. How they do it?

Trademark does not apply for unrelated goods.

See: https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/search/likelihood-confusion

Re: BlenderGPT

#55

Post by archerx »

para_parolu wrote: post #52
cbartlett wrote: post #48

Blender is a registered trademark, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with blender. I'm not sure GPT is safe or even correct either.

Bestbuy is full of equipment with Blender in name. How they do it?

They are not related to software or computer graphics.

Re: BlenderGPT

#56

Post by griomnib »

para_parolu wrote: post #52
cbartlett wrote: post #48

Blender is a registered trademark, I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with blender. I'm not sure GPT is safe or even correct either.

Bestbuy is full of equipment with Blender in name. How they do it?

They aren’t software, Blender foundation likely has exclusive use in that domain. I’m guessing if it was litigated it would come up, but that they’d prevail.

Re: BlenderGPT

#57

Post by griomnib »

mrtksn wrote: post #36
terminalbraid wrote: post #3

"Try it out for free!" Demands a google account, as if my personal info is somehow worthless.

IMHO this unjustified negativity, it's asking you to sign with your Google account which gives them very basic info about you which is very reasonable considering that they are going to give you a computationally intensive demo. It's a common practice against abuse, it's not asking you to install a tracking software or anything.

[flagged]

Re: BlenderGPT

#58

Post by mrtksn »

gd3kr wrote: post #31

Hey HN! I'm aarya (twitter.com/gd3kr) and I built BlenderGPT Really overwhelmed with the traffic, will be defaulting to a less compute intensive model for a bit. Will try to keep up with this thread and respond to questions/comments but mostly focused on not letting BlenderGPT crash. BlenderGPT is entirely bootstrapped and i'm really the only one on the team. Also, The required google sign in is only put in place to…

Cool tool, the models I created were a bit crude though. Is there a way to increase details? Is prompting affecting it? For example in image generation adding keywords like "photorealistic, octane, HD" helps. Is this the case in this tool too?

Also, I'm curious on how this works? It appears that when you use a text prompt it first generates an image thumbnail of the model. Is it first creating an image from propmpt and then running this image to create the 3D model?

Post reply on HN