901–910 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm beginning to write off most images as AI. I actually think that's where this is all headed.
There are projects like https://contentcredentials.org/ . If we want, with some effort we could distinguish between real and ai generated. If.
Every day that passes I grow fonder of Google's decision to delay or otherwise keep a lot of this under the wraps. The other day I was scrolling down on YouTube shorts and a couple videos invoked an uncanny valley response from me (I think it was a clip of an unrealistically large snake covering some hut) which was somehow fascinating and strange and captivating, and then scrolling down a few more, again I saw someth…
I wish Google would allow me to remove the AI stuff from search results. 99% of the times it's either useless or wrong.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>you and many others are being trained in AI discernment HN is a hyper specialized group of people. The average person can not do this and as we've seen devours up misinformation with no second thoughts.
On one hand, I like to think that society is getting trained to recognize AI and distrust it. But at the same time my retired boomer parents are over for the holidays and I catch them watching youtube videos completely oblivious to the fact it's an AI voice and just reading an LLM generated script with B roll for eye candy. Often times it's just stolen auto generated captions from larger creators regurgitated by an A…
But it is funny to see how much stuff gets uploaded with zero quality control and still gets traction. These models really don't deal will with "innocent" letter substitutions, Iike using I instead of l.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It saddens me. Innovations in AI 'art' generation (music, audio, photo) have been a net negative to society and are already actively harming the Internet and our media sphere. Like I said in another comment, LLMs are cool and useful, but who in the hell asked for AI art? It's good enough to fool people and break the fragile trust relationship we had with online content, but is also extremely shit and carries no meani…
Go on civil.AI, it’s primarily used for hardcore waifu porn.
Not available in France yet, I'd we interested to know if it's a matter of progressive rollout, or some form of legislation (EU or otherwise ?) that's making OpenAI cautious ? Something like the EU AI Act [1] ? In a sane world, any video produced by Sora would be required to have a form of watermarking that's on par with what intellectual property owners require. We've put people in jail for sharing copyrighted movie…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So Musk was right?
No, because Musk encourages AI slop if people are willing to pay. What we probably need (this is going to sound crazy, but I don’t have a better suggestion), is some kind of networked trust system.
Every day that passes I grow fonder of Google's decision to delay or otherwise keep a lot of this under the wraps. The other day I was scrolling down on YouTube shorts and a couple videos invoked an uncanny valley response from me (I think it was a clip of an unrealistically large snake covering some hut) which was somehow fascinating and strange and captivating, and then scrolling down a few more, again I saw someth…
MKBHD's review of the new Sora release: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY2x0TyKzIQ
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish Google would allow me to remove the AI stuff from search results. 99% of the times it's either useless or wrong.
Nobody has any clue what is AI stuff these days. Apart from the obvious ones, no one can tell a generative AI apart from 3D rendered stuff or low-res photos. Put image compression on top and it's definitely impossible.