Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#2>“The true way is along a rope that is not spanned high in the air, but only just above the ground. It seems intended more to cause stumbling than to be walked along.”
Is this a reference to Nietzsche?
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#3>“The true way is along a rope that is not spanned high in the air, but only just above the ground. It seems intended more to cause stumbling than to be walked along.” Is this a reference to Nietzsche?
as in: "Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Superman--a rope over an abyss. A dangerous crossing, a dangerous wayfaring, a dangerous looking-back, a dangerous trembling and halting." ?
i'm not sure Nietzsche was referring to his 'rope' as something to be crossed, but something to _be_, as in we all are constantly between animal and superman at all times
if we start somewhere with the goal of ending somewhere, that meshes less along their (and my personal, so this may be a judgement) lines of 'personal determinism'
the next lines: "What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal: what is lovable in man is that he is an over-going and a down-going."
might help us with an opinion from a native speaker of Nietzsche
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#4I think the writer here is resisting Kafka's message.
In a classic adventure, the hero fights bravely against the odds and succeeds. In Kafka, the hero fights bravely against the odds and fails. Like Camus, Kafka finds vitality (not hope!) in the impossible struggle.
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#5I think the writer here is resisting Kafka's message. In a classic adventure, the hero fights bravely against the odds and succeeds. In Kafka, the hero fights bravely against the odds and fails. Like Camus, Kafka finds vitality (not hope!) in the impossible struggle.
I think some doesn't understood what does a "hobby" make. I for myself thought again about a new hobby for myself, thinking about "walking in front of a cinema, while reading a book." -that may become a hobby, my hobby.
After the last time, someone wanted to gift me with playing in a band, while selling overpriced "percussions"... Awfuly that (given) hobby came my way while "Einstürzende Neubauten" started to gain a little more popularity. wink
Now, if that isn't Off-topic... I dunno...^^
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#6>“The true way is along a rope that is not spanned high in the air, but only just above the ground. It seems intended more to cause stumbling than to be walked along.” Is this a reference to Nietzsche?
It being the reference to Freud that the article presents seems more likely.
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#7The full essay is available on Gwern's site - https://gwern.net/doc/fiction/humor/1922-kafka-investigation...
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#8I think the writer here is resisting Kafka's message. In a classic adventure, the hero fights bravely against the odds and succeeds. In Kafka, the hero fights bravely against the odds and fails. Like Camus, Kafka finds vitality (not hope!) in the impossible struggle.
I disagree with a few of the readings, too. Like the discussion of "air dogs" or "soaring dogs" in the linked translation:
> Or again, the enigma of nourishment is easily solved when one understands that the dogs are being fed by an invisible hand, throwing scraps to hungry hounds. Likewise, the Lufthunde or air dogs are the pampered lapdogs of the bourgeoisie, toted around in well-to-do ladies’ arms, or nowadays in designer pooch purses.
While that is of course correct about the food, I think Kafka was not repeating himself, because the soaring dogs come with some hard-to-explain features like being highly voluble utterers of nonsense or the narrator saying he's never seen them. Why would a purse dog utter nonsense or the narrator never see one? It seems like because of the length of the soaring dogs passage, it has to be doing something more interesting than 'unseen human hands' again and have some more clever solution. Given that the whole point of the allegory/roman a clef is the narrator misunderstanding parts of the human world involving dogs and the challenge to the reader to figure out what is really being described, my belief is that the air dogs might be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/His_Master%27s_Voice satire - too well known to need any explanation back then, but now utterly obscure.
Note this is also used by Stanislaw Lem in a similar way in his SF novel _His Master's Voice_: the dog is confused by and unable to understand "his master's voice" coming from a machine, because such technology is beyond the capacity of a simple dog to understand in full, no matter how long the dog investigates the gramophone, even if some fragments of the sound make sense.
This seems to me to be a very Kafkaesque point to make.
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#9I think the writer here is resisting Kafka's message. In a classic adventure, the hero fights bravely against the odds and succeeds. In Kafka, the hero fights bravely against the odds and fails. Like Camus, Kafka finds vitality (not hope!) in the impossible struggle.
I don't think it is necessarily true that the hero fails, or that he finds vitality in it in Kafka's work. In The Trial, our hero refuses the struggle (the opposite of vitality in it!) and gives up, dying "like a dog" in his words. In The Castle, our hero diligently tries to play the game but again finds the opposite of vitality in it; his status is repeatedly degraded. His status at the end is still indeterminate but he remains hopeful.
I think in general that if you think you've summed up Kafka with a sentence decisive enough that you can accuse others of resisting his message, then you probably prefigured your interpretation with the biases you brought into your first reading of him.
Re: Kafka's Screwball Tragedy: Investigations of a Philosophical Dog
#10Who else clicked thinking Apache Kafka?