Live data from Hacker News

China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

sand-boarding.com

11–20 of 161 posts

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#11
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

China has built 30,000 miles of high speed rails it doesn't need [1], going into $1 trillion of debt and other liabilities. Just keeping up with its debt requires $25 billion annually. Incidentally, Chinese local governments are now $11 trillion in debt [2], with all provinces except Shanghai in 2023 being positive on revenues. And now there are around 4000 ghost railway stations [3]

[1]: https://www.wsj.com/world/china/xi-high-speed-trains-china-3... [2]: https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-economy-debt-borrowing... [3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhclmurNUuw

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#12
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've sometimes wondered whether arid parts of the American Southwest could, through the right kind of permaculture interventions, support more biological carbon sequestration, more plant life, drive development of richer soil etc. But I suspect if you said "we're gonna use this big section of BLM land to incrementally try to keep water in the landscape, and introduce a sequence of plant species that can increase carb…

[flagged]

Looking at your posting history, you shouldn't be telling others how to spend their time on the internet.

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#13
post #8

[flagged]

Unlike when God slaughtered several million bison, right? https://allthatsinteresting.com/buffalo-slaughter

That’s the second clause. Anything after 50 years ago interferes with the environment. Even returning things to before that time interferes with the environment. That’s the cutoff date I’m afraid.

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#14
post #11
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

China has built 30,000 miles of high speed rails it doesn't need [1], going into $1 trillion of debt and other liabilities. Just keeping up with its debt requires $25 billion annually. Incidentally, Chinese local governments are now $11 trillion in debt [2], with all provinces except Shanghai in 2023 being positive on revenues. And now there are around 4000 ghost railway stations [3] [1]: https://www.wsj.com/world/ch…

What does this have to do with anything?

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#15
post #11
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

China has built 30,000 miles of high speed rails it doesn't need [1], going into $1 trillion of debt and other liabilities. Just keeping up with its debt requires $25 billion annually. Incidentally, Chinese local governments are now $11 trillion in debt [2], with all provinces except Shanghai in 2023 being positive on revenues. And now there are around 4000 ghost railway stations [3] [1]: https://www.wsj.com/world/ch…

Is 25B in interest expenses extreme here?

Edit: oh just for the rail costs

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#16
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

> China is not without its issues but neither is the US government and at least China is investing in long-term infrastructure for their people.

Do you claim USA doesn't invest in long-term infrastructure?

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#17
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unlike when God slaughtered several million bison, right? https://allthatsinteresting.com/buffalo-slaughter

That’s the second clause. Anything after 50 years ago interferes with the environment. Even returning things to before that time interferes with the environment. That’s the cutoff date I’m afraid.

Ah, right, the 50-year cut-off makes a lot of sense, circa Exxon Mobil deciding to engage in the largest terraforming experiment done on Earth for profit despite its own knowledge of the consequences. That makes total sense; God created Exxon Mobil, and anything we do to challenge it is interfering with God's fine handiwork.

Let me prepare the school curricula for next calendar year.

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#18
post #15
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

China has built 30,000 miles of high speed rails it doesn't need [1], going into $1 trillion of debt and other liabilities. Just keeping up with its debt requires $25 billion annually. Incidentally, Chinese local governments are now $11 trillion in debt [2], with all provinces except Shanghai in 2023 being positive on revenues. And now there are around 4000 ghost railway stations [3] [1]: https://www.wsj.com/world/ch…

Is 25B in interest expenses extreme here? Edit: oh just for the rail costs

jmyeet mentioned building rails, and baserev makes a counterargument, that it isn't necessarily a good "investment".

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#19
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

[dead]

Re: China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

#20
post #11
post #10

China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the "War on Terror" and what could've been done with the money instead. I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1]. China is not without its issues but neither…

China has built 30,000 miles of high speed rails it doesn't need [1], going into $1 trillion of debt and other liabilities. Just keeping up with its debt requires $25 billion annually. Incidentally, Chinese local governments are now $11 trillion in debt [2], with all provinces except Shanghai in 2023 being positive on revenues. And now there are around 4000 ghost railway stations [3] [1]: https://www.wsj.com/world/ch…

In WSJ article

> China State Railway’s liabilities grew to a record of about $860 billion as of September

Meanwhile it's about same as US military spending in one fiscal year.

I'd rather wasting money on things I don't need, rather than kill others.

Post reply on HN