Live data from Hacker News

Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

spectrum.ieee.org

91–100 of 138 posts

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#91
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The fact this Chinese ship was chased down and stopped before getting too far away was actually pretty lucky. Were they actually stopped? The linked Reuters article only says: "The ship now sits idle in international waters but inside Denmark's exclusive economic zone, closely watched by Danish military vessels." which makes it sound like it stopped of its own accord. It's also uncertain what, if anything Denmark or…

> Were they actually stopped? I think the broad, practical answer to that is 'almost certainly'. I'm pretty sure if warships hadn't shown up and asked to come over and have a chat, the ship wouldn't still be sitting there. There's also probably a very technical legal answer which may indicate they weren't "stopped" at all based on the precise wording actually communicated and relevant maritime law. Interestingly, a l…

I can not find any recent updates, but this one (from 29/11, in Swedish) mentions ongoing discussions with China making progress on reaching an agreement to allow the Swedish navy to board the ship:

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/kina-redo-att-samarbeta-o...

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#92

Can someone explain this excerpt to me? NATO is currently investigating future internet backup routes through satellites in the case of undersea cable failures. But that technology is only in a preliminary, proof-of-concept stage and may be many years from real-world relevance. We already have satellite links and can configure our networks to route through them when a primary route disappears. Why are they saying thi…

These cables offer enough bandwidth to service an entire country and then some, because they're also passing along data coming from further on. We have no satellites that can offer anything close to that rate.

IIRC starlink might try

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#93
post #44
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vandalism of public phones (when they existed) was pretty common in my city. And garbage bins in public spaces get destroyed all the time for no reason. Everything that isn't nailed down and very robust gets destroyed or stolen. Infrastructure things related to water pipes (at the buildings level) gets stolen, too (happened in my building recently). Everything that can be resold as raw materials gets stolen.

Does your city have those scooters that people ride without helmets at great speeds?

We used to, briefly. It was a failed experiment (not sure if they stole them, though I guess some were stolen).

We still have bikes though.

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#94

I remember reading that the early telegram adopters were really surprised that no one destroyed the lines just for fun. They all thought it was a doomed technology cause the masses would sabotage it. TBH we’ve been pretty lucky for the last 2 centuries.

Just look at the airport luggage belt. Runs on reciprocal altruism. Most people are not good (and this was true even before CCTV, for the cynics :) )

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#95
post #73

Cables can be buried in trenches in the ocean bottom. There are cable plows for this. [1] They're huge and slow. Undersea power cables are routinely buried, but comm cables are only buried near shore. The downside of cable burial is that repair is harder. [1] https://www.smd.co.uk/category/trenching/

There isn't a significant upside either.

At the end of the day, buring cable throughout it's way is very expensive while damaging it at one spot, even if it's buried, is not that hard or expensive.

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe a stupid question, but is it possible to run a power cable next to the internet cables, so any ship dragging its anchor over the cables gets a rude surprise? Or that wouldn't work underwater?

That wouldn't do anything, you'd just be sending it straight to ground.

"straight to ground" is not how electricity works, but yes, they'd probably just destroy the cable in that spot, and the anchor would have only a slight scar on it at most

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#98
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The fact this Chinese ship was chased down and stopped before getting too far away was actually pretty lucky. Were they actually stopped? The linked Reuters article only says: "The ship now sits idle in international waters but inside Denmark's exclusive economic zone, closely watched by Danish military vessels." which makes it sound like it stopped of its own accord. It's also uncertain what, if anything Denmark or…

> Were they actually stopped? I think the broad, practical answer to that is 'almost certainly'. I'm pretty sure if warships hadn't shown up and asked to come over and have a chat, the ship wouldn't still be sitting there. There's also probably a very technical legal answer which may indicate they weren't "stopped" at all based on the precise wording actually communicated and relevant maritime law. Interestingly, a l…

Thank you for sharing the story. I’m always fascinated by these industries that exist in international waters. Are there any books you recommend that capture what modern seafaring is like?

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you consider an underwater cable running from Finland to Germany or Sweden to Lithuania in the Baltic Sea, it is virtually impossible for a ship travelling from St. Petersburg to the Kattegat to avoid passing over it, so redundancy can do only that much there.

Maybe a stupid question, but is it possible to run a power cable next to the internet cables, so any ship dragging its anchor over the cables gets a rude surprise? Or that wouldn't work underwater?

Undersea cables already have electric cables to power the embedded repeaters

Re: Protecting undersea internet cables is a tech nightmare

#100
post #6

It’s impossible to protect these cables so the only thing you can do is build in massive redundancy. Strategically it is probably cheaper to lay down many dozens of these cables in different locations than expect to protect them

But I assume layering cable is not a one time cost right? There should be some operation cost involved? Such as maintenance? I am still hoping sometime we could have massive amount of hollow fibre undersea cable to reduce latency between different continents.

No, you don’t do maintenance on them. They are designed to be laid and forgotten.
Post reply on HN