Live data from Hacker News

Facebook's Little Red Book

map.cv

41–50 of 300 posts

Re: Facebook's Little Red Book

#41
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can kind of understand having that kind of optimism back in the Internet of, say, 1998, before we saw how vampiric venture-backed winner-take-most tech companies would be. But by 2012, it would be incredibly naive of tech employees (of any company) to seriously believe they were some kind of force for good.

This take feels very out of touch with how tech was in 2012. It was evident where the trends were heading, but that optimism that was heavy throughout the tech boom in the late 2000s was definitely still there.

[flagged]

Re: Facebook's Little Red Book

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook is definitely a "great company" by Person of the Year rules[1]. There are some real whoppers on that list. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year

It is great in the sense that it is very large.

And has completely changed the world.

Re: Facebook's Little Red Book

#47
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, nobody “educated” believed this.

That might be the most blatant "no true Scotsman" I've ever seen. Practically out of a textbook. I'm educated. I and hundreds of coworkers at multiple companies still believed it in 2012. You said something that is simply, provably untrue.

Sure, you’re right. People thought this.

Re: Facebook's Little Red Book

#49
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is great in the sense that it is very large.

And has completely changed the world.

I think Google aped Facebook on world-changing by harvesting data and running algorithms to get you to scroll through a list. Changed the US might be more accurate.
Post reply on HN