Live data from Hacker News

Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

rt.com

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

#6
> ... the list of reasons for which the government will be allowed to shut down a site is now strictly defined ... (and) ... includes web pages which advocate suicide, substance abuse, excessively risky behavior, and child pornography.

Isn't this pretty much the same as they have in Australia and France?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australi...

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_France

Re: Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

#7

> ... the list of reasons for which the government will be allowed to shut down a site is now strictly defined ... (and) ... includes web pages which advocate suicide, substance abuse, excessively risky behavior, and child pornography. Isn't this pretty much the same as they have in Australia and France? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australi... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_cens…

Similar, yes, but the key distinction is that neither Australia nor France are governed by an autocratic regime with a history of using such laws to exert political control.

For example, let's say a group is organizing and advertising a demonstration on a social network, and the odds are good that the protest will result in a police crackdown. Might this be excessively risky behavior? The Kremlin's answer would likely depend on the group, and whether the ruling party has a political interest to clamp down.

Re: Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

#8

> ... the list of reasons for which the government will be allowed to shut down a site is now strictly defined ... (and) ... includes web pages which advocate suicide, substance abuse, excessively risky behavior, and child pornography. Isn't this pretty much the same as they have in Australia and France? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australi... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_cens…

Internet is the only place left,at least it was the only place, where people could criticize United Russia party and discuss the current situation in the country.

Now a simple blog post like "Lets go protest our government" could be considered as advocating risky behavior, and as such get blocked by Government.

Re: Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

#9
At least, the public outrage led to the exclusion of several extremely vague terms from the bill, like "information that might be harmful for children", so wikipedia blackout wasn't in vain, after all.

However, this showed us, once again, how incompetent our deputies are, when it comes to internet and technical stuff.

Re: Russian Duma adopts 'site blacklist' bill

#10

> ... the list of reasons for which the government will be allowed to shut down a site is now strictly defined ... (and) ... includes web pages which advocate suicide, substance abuse, excessively risky behavior, and child pornography. Isn't this pretty much the same as they have in Australia and France? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Australi... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_cens…

Similar, yes, but the key distinction is that neither Australia nor France are governed by an autocratic regime with a history of using such laws to exert political control. For example, let's say a group is organizing and advertising a demonstration on a social network, and the odds are good that the protest will result in a police crackdown. Might this be excessively risky behavior? The Kremlin's answer would likel…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN