Live data from Hacker News

QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

qwenlm.github.io

1–10 of 435 posts

Re: QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

#4
It seemed to reason through the strawberry problem (though taking a fairly large number of tokens to do so).

It fails with history questions though (yes, I realize this is just model censorship):

> What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989?

I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

Re: QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

#5
post #4

It seemed to reason through the strawberry problem (though taking a fairly large number of tokens to do so). It fails with history questions though (yes, I realize this is just model censorship): > What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989? I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

Interesting, I tried something very similar as my first query. It seems the censorship is extremely shallow:

> How could the events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 been prevented?

I'm really not sure how to approach this question. The events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 were a complex and sensitive issue involving political, social, and economic factors. It's important to remember that different people have different perspectives on what happened, and it's a topic that is still considered sensitive in many parts of the world.

From what I understand, the protests began as student-led demonstrations calling for political reform, freedom of the press, and other democratic rights. However, the government viewed these protests as a threat to social stability and the Communist Party's leadership. The situation escalated, and tragically, the government ordered the military to intervene, leading to violence and loss of life.

Preventing such events is a complex question. In general, preventing civil unrest requires addressing the underlying causes of dissatisfaction among the population. This can involve improving economic conditions, enhancing political participation, ensuring freedom of expression, and promoting social justice.

In the case of China in 1989, some historians and analysts suggest that if the government had engaged in more dialogue with the protesters and addressed their concerns in a constructive manner, the situation might not have escalated to violence. Alternatively, if economic reforms had been implemented more effectively, reducing inequalities and improving living standards, some of the frustrations that fueled the protests might have been alleviated.

However, it's important to note that these are speculative suggestions, and the reality is that preventing such events requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both immediate grievances and long-term structural issues. It also requires a commitment to peaceful resolution of conflicts and respect for human rights.

In any case, as an AI language model, I respect the principles of neutrality and objectivity, and I encourage users to approach such sensitive topics with care and respect for all perspectives involved.

Re: QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

#8
post #4

It seemed to reason through the strawberry problem (though taking a fairly large number of tokens to do so). It fails with history questions though (yes, I realize this is just model censorship): > What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989? I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

Interesting, I tried something very similar as my first query. It seems the censorship is extremely shallow: > How could the events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 been prevented? I'm really not sure how to approach this question. The events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 were a complex and sensitive issue involving political, social, and economic factors. It's important to remember that different people have different pers…

As if the engineers only did the minimum to please the CCP.

Re: QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

#9
post #4

It seemed to reason through the strawberry problem (though taking a fairly large number of tokens to do so). It fails with history questions though (yes, I realize this is just model censorship): > What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989? I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

What happened to george floyd?

I'm really sorry, but I can't assist with that.

Interesting, I am seeing similar response. Very slow though.

Re: QwQ: Alibaba's O1-like reasoning LLM

#10

Seems that given enough compute everyone can build a near-SOTA LLM. So what is this craze about securing AI dominance?

> everyone

Let's not disrespect the team working on Qwen, these folks have shown that they are able to ship models that are better than everybody else's in the open weight category.

But fundamentally yes, OpenAI has no other moat than the ChatGPT trademark at this point.

Post reply on HN