Live data from Hacker News

Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

nianticlabs.com

131–140 of 365 posts

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#131
Conversation about ‘players are the product’ of Pokémon go aside… What are some practical applications of an LGM?

Seems like navigation is ‘solved’? There’s already a lot of technology supporting permanence of virtual objects based on spatial mapping? Better AI generated animations?

I am sure there are a ton of innovations it could unlock…

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> which is totally unfair, every niantic player should have access to all the stuff because they collectively made it I don't understand this perspective. While all players may have collectively made this model possible, no individual player could make a model like it based on their contributions alone. Since no single player could replicate this outcome based on only their data, does it not imply that there's value…

[flagged]

Niantic was clear about the product of the labor: In exchange for swiping the PokeStop, you'd get the rewards. No one was ever told they'd get more than that, and no one had any reasonable expectation that they'd get more.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Niantic was clear about the product of the labor: In exchange for swiping the PokeStop, you'd get the rewards. No one was ever told they'd get more than that, and no one had any reasonable expectation that they'd get more.

Expectations are often unreasonable from some perspective. It's not difficult to see why users are upset.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#134
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Niantic made 700 million dollars last year, mostly selling virtual game items.

Why would anyone think niantic would protect user-data from profit?

Sarcastically, no one should.

Unsarcastically, a lot of people believe user data belongs to users, and that they should have a say in how it's used. Here, I think the point is that Niantic decided they could use the data this way and weren't transparent about it until it was already done. I'm sure I would be in the minority, but I would never have played - or never have done certain things like the research tasks - had I known I was training an AI model.

I'm sure the Po:Go EULA that no one reads has blanket grants saying "you agree that we can do whatever we want," so I can't complain too hard, but still disappointed I spent any time in that game.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#135
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Niantic made 700 million dollars last year, mostly selling virtual game items.

Why would anyone think niantic would protect user-data from profit?

Because not everyone is a seasoned IT professional.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone think niantic would protect user-data from profit?

Because not everyone is a seasoned IT professional.

I don't think you need to be an "IT professional" to understand that not paying money doesn't imply that you aren't giving away value.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#137
post #20

This is pretty cool, but I feel as a pokehunter (Pokemon Go player), I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor. How? They consistently incentivize you to scan pokestops (physical locations) through "research tasks" and give you some useful items as rewards. The effort is usually much more significant than what you get in return, so I have stopped doing it. It's…

Imagine how those of us who played Ingress (Niantic's first game) feel... We were tricked into contributing location data for the game we loved, only to see it reused for the far more popular (and profitable) Pokemon Go.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone think niantic would protect user-data from profit?

Sarcastically, no one should. Unsarcastically, a lot of people believe user data belongs to users, and that they should have a say in how it's used. Here, I think the point is that Niantic decided they could use the data this way and weren't transparent about it until it was already done. I'm sure I would be in the minority, but I would never have played - or never have done certain things like the research tasks - h…

> Unsarcastically, a lot of people believe user data belongs to users, and that they should have a say in how it's used

I can understand that people believe this, but why do they do? Nothing in our society operates in a way that might imply this.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because not everyone is a seasoned IT professional.

I don't think you need to be an "IT professional" to understand that not paying money doesn't imply that you aren't giving away value.

I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of the people playing Pokemon Go have never even considered the question.

Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Google actually has released weights for some of their models, but judging by the fact that this model is potentially valuable, they likely will not allow Niantic for this which is totally unfair, every niantic player should have access to all the stuff because they collectively made it

Welcome to the modern internet. While you're at it, please get me access to Google's captcha models facebook face directory Google's GPS location data hoard, (most every android phone on the planet 24/7 (!) and any iPhone navigating with gmaps) And so on and so on All of which I've directly contributed to and never (directly) recieved anything in return

> any iPhone navigating with gmaps

Not saying you are saying this but it amused me how many people believe(d) that Apple wasn’t mining and hoarding location data either because well, they’re Apple and they love you. All those traffic statuses in Apple Maps on minor side streets with no monitoring came from the … traffic fairy, perhaps.

Post reply on HN