Live data from Hacker News

DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

bloomberg.com

81–90 of 1001 posts

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#81
post #57

Who would possibly buy Chrome? Letting any of the large tech companies purchase it (the only possible buyers) would just give someone else monopolistic power. Chrome can’t exist as a standalone business without being even more consumer hostile.

The full circle of course is MS will end up acquiring it.

This is surely the only real possibility, and puts Edge's shift to Chromium in a new light; could MS have predicted/lobbied for this push?

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#83
post #49

Who would possibly buy Chrome? Letting any of the large tech companies purchase it (the only possible buyers) would just give someone else monopolistic power. Chrome can’t exist as a standalone business without being even more consumer hostile.

A consortium of various tech companies, plus non-profits? Instead of it being in one corporate hand. One can dream of the EFF and Mozilla plus a bunch of other stakeholders owning it.

Is Chrome being run so bad that we need even more committees, councils and bureaucrats to implement every single feature ?

Microsoft is already using the Chromium and changing the default search engine to Bing and shipping it as Edge. What else is needed?

This DOJ looks like they just want to pad their resumes with some grandiose case which might be bad for everyone else.

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#85

I'm very confused. Chrome is just Chromium with Google's own Telemetry. Chromium is open and maintained primarily by Google. Sure, there's a userbase, but you need a business model to take advantage of it in the first place because the benefit was the Telemetry (Google's) and Google's Ecosystem. Also, the article specifically mentions Chrome, NOT Chromium (which again, is open), so what incentive would Google have to…

I'm worried about what happens to the Chrome extension store. If Google sells Chrome, then does that also mean the Chrome store? I guess it would have to. So not only does someone need to buy Chrome, they also have to operate the Chrome store too. I'm not sure this is going to work out well.

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#87
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The full circle of course is MS will end up acquiring it.

This is surely the only real possibility, and puts Edge's shift to Chromium in a new light; could MS have predicted/lobbied for this push?

[dead]

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#89
post #26

Who would possibly buy Chrome? Letting any of the large tech companies purchase it (the only possible buyers) would just give someone else monopolistic power. Chrome can’t exist as a standalone business without being even more consumer hostile.

In the most chaotic alternate reality possible: Mozilla

na... Oracle.

Re: DOJ will push Google to sell off Chrome

#90
post #79
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People gravitate towards Chrome in part because of Google’s heavy marketing of it. Whenever I sign into Gmail in Safari I get a pop up about a “better experience” awaiting me.

Chrome is definitely a better experience than Safari, and not by a little bit. In many ways Safari is the worst browser out there right now. Most of its market share comes from the fact that Apple still forces Safari to be used on iOS no matter what browser you think you have installed. I think the DOJ should go after Apple harder on that than they are on Google, because nobody is forcing anyone to use Chrome the sam…

I agree that the DOJ should enforce browser choice in iOS much like the EU has but in this scenario it feels besides the point. No matter how better or worse anyone might think Safari is it’s my right to choose which browser I access a site with, and I’d rather not be harassed to change.
Post reply on HN