Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Take your bigotry somewhere else.
We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
241–250 of 274 posts
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#242Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then unsubscribe from that blocklist.
Does that unblock whoever got blocked by the rogue blocklist?
(Outside of eventual consistency, of course.)
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.
I'll disagree, I'm here for all stripes, and I guess I'd consider the vomit emoji to be way ruder than necessary for expressing a simple personal preference, but I'd tolerate that opinion being posted somewhere.
Denying trans people exist is transphobic. It's a ban in my book. If someone says, "I'd like to learn more about the differences between sex and gender... because they seem the same to me" I'm happy to spend basically infinite time teaching/explaining/dialoging. But if you come out with "only two genders" and "lesbians cannot have penises" I'm done conversing and you can get sent packing.
I'm not open to the idea that trans people are an illness any more than I'm open to the idea that gay people are an illness. No time or space in my life for that hate.
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.
Yep, this is pretty easy. No one ever has to say yes to an arbitrary sexual partner -- if you don't want a penis in your sexual life, rad, feel free to express that preference. I'll disagree, I'm here for all stripes, and I guess I'd consider the vomit emoji to be way ruder than necessary for expressing a simple personal preference, but I'd tolerate that opinion being posted somewhere. Denying trans people exist is t…
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
She also lost the popular vote by nearly 3M - more than the entire population of 19 different European countries - and he carried more states than his opponent 4 years ago, and more than Bush did in both 2000 & 2004. It is by all conventional and accepted definitions a resounding defeat.
It doesn't matter who wins the popular vote. Since you don't get anything for it, the campaigns don't try to increase it. I'm not getting rallies or ads in California.
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, this is pretty easy. No one ever has to say yes to an arbitrary sexual partner -- if you don't want a penis in your sexual life, rad, feel free to express that preference. I'll disagree, I'm here for all stripes, and I guess I'd consider the vomit emoji to be way ruder than necessary for expressing a simple personal preference, but I'd tolerate that opinion being posted somewhere. Denying trans people exist is t…
[flagged]
> No-one in that conversation denied the existence of anyone.
Then go on to deny the existence of trans folks. I ain't going to reply to all your hateful nonsense. Yours is the opinion that crosses over from "I don't want to hang out with trans people" to "I deny trans people", and I don't have to tolerate hateful people.
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's trying to exclude "innocent" things like selfies or "simulated" things like drawings, but those are just as illegal in some or all countries. Selfies shared between teenagers are innocent! When an adult enters the picture is when it becomes a problem, because yes: it’s abuse and exploitation that we’re objecting to. Unless we think morality is a question of aesthetics, then yes, this also means drawings are no…
Because the production process didn't involve abuse, but it's still illegal to produce them. The distribution of them does though.
Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, this is pretty easy. No one ever has to say yes to an arbitrary sexual partner -- if you don't want a penis in your sexual life, rad, feel free to express that preference. I'll disagree, I'm here for all stripes, and I guess I'd consider the vomit emoji to be way ruder than necessary for expressing a simple personal preference, but I'd tolerate that opinion being posted somewhere. Denying trans people exist is t…
[flagged]
Go back to your wizard game or 4chan