Jeff Lawson the founder of Twilio owns The Onion, glad he's growing his quality retirement project.
He seems to be doing a better job running a newspaper than Bezos.
The Onion buys Infowars
41–50 of 1001 posts
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#42I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…
What is your argument? It sounds like you aren't very familiar with the case ("whatever the claim was"), and I don't think just declaring that something is ridiculous is a very good argument.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#43I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…
It was a civil case, so no government/prosecutor, and the jury awarded much more than plaintiffs asked for. EDIT: Also you can disagree with the amount, but the award is literally the jury saying that the plaintiffs “prevailed with better arguments”
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wonderful news. I'm glad their CEO recognizes the great value of CEOs. My only worry is that this acquisition makes Global Tetraeder so large that it attracts the attention of those pesky EU bureaucrats, who will want to split it up into multiple imperfect solids.
If Brexit taught me anything it was that the correct phrase is pesky unelected EU bureaucrats!
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#45I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…
The tools and methods used were "a trial by a jury of his peers," in which better arguments did prevail. That seems entirely appropriate to a liberal democracy.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#46Funny concept. Shame that The Onion's writing these days so mid.
I think it’s more that the world is now the onion.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kids these days will never know how funny the onion used to be They used to distribute hard copies in big cities because people actually read it
They started distributing hard copies again to folks who sign up. The lack of copies on street corners has a lot more to do with the collapse in print advertising revenues than it does the jokes printed inside.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#48I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#49Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#50I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…