Live data from Hacker News

The Onion buys Infowars

nytimes.com

31–40 of 1001 posts

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#31

I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…

The ends justify the means, in some circumstances. If you play fair against monsters, monsters win.

> but the tools and methods used were entirely inappropriate to a liberal democracy, where you prevail with better arguments.

I strongly disagree this is our operating environment, based on the evidence.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#33
post #23

Funny concept. Shame that The Onion's writing these days so mid.

Kids these days will never know how funny the onion used to be They used to distribute hard copies in big cities because people actually read it

They started distributing hard copies again to folks who sign up.

The lack of copies on street corners has a lot more to do with the collapse in print advertising revenues than it does the jokes printed inside.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#35

Tim Onion's (Ben Collins) statement on Bluesky: [0] > Hi everyone. > The Onion, with the help of the Sandy Hook families, has purchased InfoWars. > We are planning on making it a very funny, very stupid website. > We have retained the services of some Onion and Clickhole Hall of Famers to pull this off. > I can't wait to show you what we have cooked up. Next post: [1] > Does anybody need millions of dollars worth of…

Is that enough to tank the market with a fire sale? Probably not.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#37

I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…

>There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage

I'd like to see someone quantify what a reasonable number would be and how they came to it.

I served on a jury where we had to award similar damages. "Anyone got any ideas how to account for this?" I asked .... nobody had any good ones.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#38
post #2

The announcement by America's Finest News Source: https://theonion.com/heres-why-i-decided-to-buy-infowars/ Alex Jones response: https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1857058831135645739

Seems like the article is really gleeful. Somewhat ironic since The Onion could be brought down in the same way by defamation lawsuits.

> Seems like the article is really gleeful.

Good! It should be. Alex Jones is a ghoul making money from dead school shooting victims. Anything that embarrasses him is entitled to as much glee as it wants.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#39

I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…

This isn't the 18th century anymore where the dissemination of arguments barely traveled outside of the immediate vicinity, this is the globally networked firehose of disinformation blasted right in your face 24-hours a day. Relying on better arguments to win hearts and minds in this environment is hopelessly naive.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#40

I'm very much not a fan of Q-anon and related subcultures, but the sandy-hook award of $1.5 billion is obviously ridiculous, and is clearly just a government/institutional exercise in dictatorial/systemic power. There is no possible way that someone ranting on the internet can cause 1.5 billion of emotional damage or whatever the claim was. In particular, the libel (and it should be libel, making claims that are not…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN