Live data from Hacker News

A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

openai.com

41–50 of 318 posts

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#41
This is nice, but it's not at all how students use ChatGPT (anecdotal based on my kid and her friends who are at the uni right now).

The way they actually use is to get ChatGPT to generate ALL their homework and submit that. And sometimes take home exams too. And the weird thing is that some professors are perfectly cool with it.

I am starting to question whether the cost of going to a place of higher learning is worth it.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#42

In the age of google + AI + instant access to info, knowing how to ask the question is more important than knowing the answer.

Sure if your goal is to generate a race of Eloi who live exclusively as passive consumers, casually disregarding anything a machine can hide from their feeble minds.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't it be unfair towards the students who want to learn without LLMs?

Why does that matter? LLMs are going to be increasingly important tools, so it's valuable for educators to help students understand how to use them well. If you choose to exclude modern tools in your teaching to avoid disadvantaging those who don't want to use them, you disadvantage all the students who do want to use them. To put it another way, modern high school level math classes disadvantage students who want to…

I disagree. I see an LLM as less calculator and more as cheating. I think there's a lot of value in creating something entirely yourself without having an LLM spit out a mean solution for you to start from.

LLMs have their place and maybe even somewhere in schools but the more you automate the hard parts of tasks, the less people value the struggle of actually learning something.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've noticed that people who rely on calculators have great difficulty recognizing when their answers are off by a factor of 10. I know a hiring manager who asks his (engineering) candidates what is 20% of 20,000? It's amazing how many engineers are completely unable to do this without a calculator. He said they often cry. Of course, they're all "no hire". How did they get a degree, one wonders?

This is a sort of mental math trick that isn’t incredibly useful in day to day engineering. Now if they say 16,000 or something then maybe there’s an argument against them, but being able to calculate a tip on the fly isn’t really something worth selecting for imo

It's not a "mental math trick", it's a straightforward calculation you should be able to do in your head.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#45

I was talking to a teacher today that works with me at length about the impact of AI LLM models are having now when considering student's attitude towards learning. When I was young, I refused to learn geography because we had map applications. I could just look it up. I did the same for anything I could, offload the cognitive overhead to something better -- I think this is something we all do consciously or not. Tha…

> geography

In Germany the subject is called "Erdkunde" which would translate to geology. And this term is, I assume, more appropriate as it isn't just about what is where but also about geological history and science and how volcanoes work and how to read maps and such.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've noticed that people who rely on calculators have great difficulty recognizing when their answers are off by a factor of 10. I know a hiring manager who asks his (engineering) candidates what is 20% of 20,000? It's amazing how many engineers are completely unable to do this without a calculator. He said they often cry. Of course, they're all "no hire". How did they get a degree, one wonders?

This is a sort of mental math trick that isn’t incredibly useful in day to day engineering. Now if they say 16,000 or something then maybe there’s an argument against them, but being able to calculate a tip on the fly isn’t really something worth selecting for imo

It's not a "trick".

And yes, it's incredibly useful in enabling recognizing when your calculator gives a bogus result because you made a keyboarding error. When you've got zero feel for numbers, you're going to make bad engineering decisions. You'll also get screwed by car dealers every time, and contractors. You won't know how far you can go with the gas in your tank.

It goes on and on.

Calculators are great for getting an exact final answer. But you'd better already know approximately what the answer should be.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#48
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've noticed that people who rely on calculators have great difficulty recognizing when their answers are off by a factor of 10. I know a hiring manager who asks his (engineering) candidates what is 20% of 20,000? It's amazing how many engineers are completely unable to do this without a calculator. He said they often cry. Of course, they're all "no hire". How did they get a degree, one wonders?

I've been bashing my head against Speed Mathematics Simplified because I want to be able to do tip math without pulling out my phone.

You won't be sorry you invested the time on this.

Re: A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

#49
Human nature is to be lazy. Put another way, we will always take the path of least resistance. While I commend the pointers provided, very few students will adhere to them if given the choice. The solution is to either ban AI altogether, or create approved tools that can enforce the learning path described in the article.
Post reply on HN