Live data from Hacker News

Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

lagrangepoint.substack.com

161–170 of 202 posts

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whatever the theoretical analysis tells you, I've been able to reproduce a microwave interfering with a wifi signal with at least one microwave and router. I've had other times where it didn't have a noticeable effect though.

The key to happiness in WiFi is that all the stations have to "hear" each other, or the listen-before-talk algorithm can't work and you end up stepping on valid transmissions that you can't hear. This ruins it for the stations that are the targets of that transmission but can also hear the first station. This is why WiFi tends to degrade at longer ranges; with a topology like , both computers can hear the access poin…

> As a result, whenever you see enterprise WiFi that actually works, you'll probably be able to see a ton of access points covering a large room.

IETF attendees reengineer their hotel’s Wi-Fi network - https://www.computerworld.com/article/1448494/ietf-attendees... ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3771876 31 comments)

> “There was no WiFi signal when on the desk in front of the window in my room, but after some experiments, I discovered that the signal was quite good… on the ceiling of the bathroom,” emailed Marc Petit-Huguenin.

> “I have a Nexus S phone, so I taped it on the ceiling of the bathroom, and used tethering over Bluetooth to bridge the gap to the desk,” he explained. This is a slow connection, but good enough to send emails over SMTP or use vi [the popular Unix text editor] over SSH.”

> ... Working behind the scenes, a team of IETF attendees negotiated with the hotel and were granted access to the wireless network by Sunday night. ...

> The changes made by the IETF makeover team included:

> – Decreasing the AP receiver sensitivity ([changing] HP/Colubris configuration “distance” from “large” to “small”);

> – Increasing the minimum data and multicast rate from 1Mbps to 2Mbps;

> – Decreasing the transmit power from 20dBm to 10dBm;

> – And, turning off the radios on numerous APs to reduce the [RF] noise.

> ...

> Each floor now has approximately two access points on each of these four channels, with the channels staggered on adjacent floor. That design maximizes the distance between access points on the same channel. “I hope this will significantly improve the coverage in some rooms that had marginal or no signal while also improving the signal to noise ratio for all,” he said

----

Note that the changes were being made to decrease the power being used.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#162
post #96
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Heya! One of the authors here. Nope, its a one time thing. When the feature is enabled, a flag is set on the iCloud account, so you can travel anywhere and have it work. At the same time, a EQ profile is pushed to the transparency mode of the Airpods, enabling the hearing aid features. Once done, it sticks with the Airpods, unless you reset them. However, an interesting quirk is that if you enable this on someone's a…

I wonder if the flag gets reset every so often if the device doesn't think it's in the US for a long period of time. I've heard Apple considered that for some of the other EU restrictions

Probably not to account for people spending lots of time outside the US. The main restriction is not selling items with particular features outside of approved countries but them getting used after being bought elsewhere isn't usually a big deal. India doesn't care about my Grandma wearing her hearing aids because they're not approved in India and if the government doesn't care where's the incentive for Apple to break functionality for customers?

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#163

It appears that the Hearing Aid feature is actually an equalizer preset that is pushed to the AirPods and will replace your transparency mode. Apple could've just not marketed these as "hearing aids" or used the medical terminology, as every other TWS with parametric EQ and transparency mode can do the same thing, and they wouldn't have the regulatory hawks going after them. They only lose the marketing edge, but per…

> They only lose the marketing edge This is a bigger deal than it may sound. Apple isn't operating in a vacuum, sony[0] and bose are also targeting the market and they'll also probably do their marketing push as they see fit. Apple only having a "kinda works as a hearing aid" is a sizeable disadvantage when the other brands will have posters in prominent places at sales points. Apple would still win on online sales a…

How do Sony or Bose have any kind of retail advantage? What stores that sell Sony and Bose don't also sell Apple stuff? Plus Apple has their own stores which make more money per square foot than just about any other retailer.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I own AAPL for that marketing edge! I bought more AAPL after they announced locking down macOS to prevent third party sourced applications from running, because Apple customers are the kind who'll interpret such news as daddy protecting them and looking out for babies' best interests, which means more money going into the Apple tax to pay AAPL holders! Fwiw I refuse to own Apple, I only own AAPL.

You do know you can still use macOS to run third party closed source applications, right?

An even unsigned x86_64 apps and ad-hoc signed arm64 apps.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#165

This showcases why free software is important. Geo-locking is a such hostile practice which makes zero sense here. If the software/firmware was free and open, you’d be able to patch out/disable the geo-lock. But it probably wouldn’t be there in the first place…

Yes it does make sense in the general case. In the approved countries a regulatory body has had to approve this as a medical aid. If medical aids etc did not have to be approved then things that actually hurt and kill people could be sold as medical aids. The issue here is that this case appears to be a non damaging aid and so it looks silly to ban it. But regulations have to work otherwise they are of no use. The is…

[deleted]

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They only lose the marketing edge This is a bigger deal than it may sound. Apple isn't operating in a vacuum, sony[0] and bose are also targeting the market and they'll also probably do their marketing push as they see fit. Apple only having a "kinda works as a hearing aid" is a sizeable disadvantage when the other brands will have posters in prominent places at sales points. Apple would still win on online sales a…

How do Sony or Bose have any kind of retail advantage? What stores that sell Sony and Bose don't also sell Apple stuff? Plus Apple has their own stores which make more money per square foot than just about any other retailer.

Sony has great audio codecs and doesn't treat my Linux desktop as a second-class citizen. I have zero reason to even consider Airpods as a serious alternative for as long as they treat multipoint bluetooth as an optional feature.

Once you factor price into the equation, there's very little reason for an educated customer to pick the Airpods besides marketing. Apple doesn't give people a good reason unless they already own thousands of dollars in other Apple hardware.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They only lose the marketing edge This is a bigger deal than it may sound. Apple isn't operating in a vacuum, sony[0] and bose are also targeting the market and they'll also probably do their marketing push as they see fit. Apple only having a "kinda works as a hearing aid" is a sizeable disadvantage when the other brands will have posters in prominent places at sales points. Apple would still win on online sales a…

How do Sony or Bose have any kind of retail advantage? What stores that sell Sony and Bose don't also sell Apple stuff? Plus Apple has their own stores which make more money per square foot than just about any other retailer.

Because they’re about to sell their products as hearing aids due to the recent OTC hearing aid regulation change.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#168
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Ours, on the other hand, does it mod 3, e.g. 10 ^ {1, 3, 6, 9}. Thousands, millions, billions, et cetera. To make matters more confusing, for American English it goes millions, billions, trillions. For British English it used to go millions, milliards, billions, billiards, trillions, trilliards. (That 'long scale' is still the way German used to work ten years ago. No clue if it changed in the meantime.)

I still mourn the long scale. A billion is obviously a million millions.

It is less intuitive for me as an outsider that a trillion would be a million million millions instead of a billion billions

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still mourn the long scale. A billion is obviously a million millions.

Thanks! In germany we use the long scale, and this is the first time it clicks. "Eine Billion" is Million² bi -> 2 "Eine Billiarde" is 1000 * Million² "Eine Trillion" is million³ tri -> 3 "Eine Trilliarde" is 1000 * Million³ And so on Yes I knew what a million, milliard, billion, billiarde and so on are, but it never made click that the long scale makes so much sense.

I feel like at that point, I would rather just use scientific notation (10^x).

I also like the easy suffix for thousand (k), million (M), billion (B), trillion (T), quadrillion (Q) for written conversation. $10B revenue, 5k liters, 300M people, etc.

Re: Bypassing regulatory locks, hacking AirPods and Faraday cages

#170

This showcases why free software is important. Geo-locking is a such hostile practice which makes zero sense here. If the software/firmware was free and open, you’d be able to patch out/disable the geo-lock. But it probably wouldn’t be there in the first place…

Yes it does make sense in the general case. In the approved countries a regulatory body has had to approve this as a medical aid. If medical aids etc did not have to be approved then things that actually hurt and kill people could be sold as medical aids. The issue here is that this case appears to be a non damaging aid and so it looks silly to ban it. But regulations have to work otherwise they are of no use. The is…

Thank God for regulators! How dangerous would life be otherwise. How could we live without them?
Post reply on HN