Live data from Hacker News

About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

content.4chan.org

31–40 of 57 posts

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#31
post #9

How on earth does Cloudfare survive charging $200 for nearly 2PB of traffic? Is the profiling/retargeting business really that lucrative? Do big accounts like that have some kind of revshare deal or mandatory link skimming?

Cloudflare offers a good value, but not having things like html caching is frustrating and one of the reasons we're not using them.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#32
Wouldn't uploading their static assets to Amazon's S3 or something like that easy the burden on their servers? Wouldn't the extra cost of a service like that aliviate the load on their backend, and thus, save them more resources? I always thought that was the most compelling feature of AWS S3, besides the "unlimited storage".

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#33

I've always seen 4chan as the scumhole of the internet. It scares me that it's so huge. Do I have a wrong impression of it?

So far 4chan is one of the last places I found which still fosters an absolute anything-goes policy. It is almost a last frontier of a world where people can dump their thoughts, ideas just without having to use any form of self censorship. Once one gets over some idealistic expectation how other people should behave it is, at least from my perspective, a truly liberating experience.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#34
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Minecraft videos are regularly in the top 10 most viewed on YouTube. I think it's that Minecraft is huge plus the players are very engaged on the internet with it.

Say what you want about the quality of the game (I personally detest many of its more recent changes and its loss of clear direction), Minecraft has a huge and very, very active community. Notch might not have cracked designing a game, but he's certainly cracked making a game community.

A game that is fun and popular is by definition well designed I would say.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#35

Wouldn't uploading their static assets to Amazon's S3 or something like that easy the burden on their servers? Wouldn't the extra cost of a service like that aliviate the load on their backend, and thus, save them more resources? I always thought that was the most compelling feature of AWS S3, besides the "unlimited storage".

My understanding is, not at the scale they operate at. You're not saving any database lookups, and their bandwidth is probably cheaper. Plus the lifetime of their uploads is extremely limited - an hour or two?

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#36

I've always seen 4chan as the scumhole of the internet. It scares me that it's so huge. Do I have a wrong impression of it?

Think of it like a really crowded dormitory whose lower floors are overrun by a never-ending frat party. The first person you run into when you show up will likely be projectile vomiting, or teabagging someone who passed out. Bored jerks are free to wander upstairs and urinate in any room in the building, and the deafeningly loud music and incoherent screaming is a backdrop (albeit distant at times) to every stimulating conversation that takes place.

If you want to enjoy yourself, you kind of have to know where you're going, and how to knock. Even on "quiet" boards like /lit/, the front page is churning with new threads. Everything is steeped in weird slang and inside jokes. There is no respect for newcomers. People who don't "get" the culture are dismissed with "lurk moar" or simply ignored.

Also, there is always someone, somewhere, who will find any given post hilarious.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#37

4chan's comment system is awful. I still don't really understand how it works. It seems like they could improve the design and pipe in new comments as they arrive, thus negating all the extra server load caused by browser extensions refreshing every second. Of course, I have no experience dealing with ~1B page views/month.

What kind of comment system do you want?

I'd write something in detail but I really can't guess what your complaint would be. Unless you want recursive threading or tags.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Say what you want about the quality of the game (I personally detest many of its more recent changes and its loss of clear direction), Minecraft has a huge and very, very active community. Notch might not have cracked designing a game, but he's certainly cracked making a game community.

A game that is fun and popular is by definition well designed I would say.

I suppose. I used to find it fun, but some of the changes made more recently have drained much of the fun from it, for me.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#39

I've always seen 4chan as the scumhole of the internet. It scares me that it's so huge. Do I have a wrong impression of it?

I would recomend the /fit. Is a great place to get tips and encouragement for exercises. But go away from /b, it's a mess.

It's also summertime, so there's plenty of summerfriends already. Remember to read the sticky at the top of the first page.

Re: About 4chans current stats and infrastructure

#40

4chan's comment system is awful. I still don't really understand how it works. It seems like they could improve the design and pipe in new comments as they arrive, thus negating all the extra server load caused by browser extensions refreshing every second. Of course, I have no experience dealing with ~1B page views/month.

Install the mentioned 4chanx extension. Hovering a quoted post ID will actually show the post, and you can also see/expand replies to a post in the top right.
Post reply on HN