Microservices Can Wait
gauge.sh
Microservices Can Wait
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Microservices Can Wait
#2"Don’t solve for problems you don’t yet have"
Re: Microservices Can Wait
#3[deleted]
Re: Microservices Can Wait
#4> By their nature, microservices require you to define what each service is responsible for. Akin to waterfall development, this means making structural choices before you’ve had a chance to observe the system. These definitions inevitably end up being incorrect, as you know the least about your domain in the beginning.
This is a terrible analog. Interfaces, versioning, and composite services address all of this.
Re: Microservices Can Wait
#5> By their nature, microservices require you to define what each service is responsible for. Akin to waterfall development, this means making structural choices before you’ve had a chance to observe the system. These definitions inevitably end up being incorrect, as you know the least about your domain in the beginning. This is a terrible analog. Interfaces, versioning, and composite services address all of this.
Not disagreeing with you, but do you have a link on process which includes your callouts would work for micro services?
Re: Microservices Can Wait
#6For an article like this, what is the difference between a service and a microservice?
Seems to lots of space between monolith and microservice