Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
thebignewsletter.com
Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
1–10 of 321 posts
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#2Behold: the Market doing Market shit.
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#3[flagged]
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#4Behold: the Market doing Market shit.
Behold: Market participants using government to disable other market participants.
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#5Behold: the Market doing Market shit.
This is precisely the opposite of that, in fact.
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#6Behold: the Market doing Market shit.
Do you mean free market? Because I feel like land use restrictions are antithetical to a free market. In which case, your comment makes no sense.
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#7It's funny to see Matt Stoller complain about land use restrictions here, as he refuses to acknowledge the problem for residential building:
https://x.com/matthewstoller/status/1824155610201432264
If apartment buildings are banned in 96% of residential land in California, with most of the 4% already built up with apartments, isn't that pretty similar to the commercial land use situation in Mammoth, CA?
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#8Behold: the Market doing Market shit.
This isn't a "market" doing something, it's a monopolist doing monopolist stuff. One kind of precludes the other...
Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#9Re: Albertsons kills rural grocers with land use restrictions
#10N.B. for headline-readers: the land use restrictions in question are deed covenants, not zoning restrictions.