Live data from Hacker News

Zed – The Editor for What's Next

zed.dev

31–40 of 54 posts

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#31
post #15

"Zed collects anonymous telemetry data to help us understand how people are using the app." No thanks!

simple as two config options in `.zed/settings.json` (or `~/.config/zed/settings.json`): ``` { "telemetry": { "diagnostics": false, "metrics": false } } ``` for anyone who wants a fast, modern, resource-minimal, gpu-native text editor that is open source.

This should be opt-in or at least have a giant red confirmation dialog shown until the user agrees.

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#32
post #26

I've seen a million and one text editors, and almost all of them offer the feature of being "fast " or "gpu driven" or "cleanly implemented" (now "AI integrated"; LOL). Never features that users actually care about. Perhaps this is just my ego taking, but I think I would struggle to develop such an app. What is the point in programming if you aren't presenting the user with anything new? I suppose the collaborative f…

> How about a text editor which represents code as a syntax tree that is formatted as you type? Or one that has support for embedding multi-media content within source files? Or one with advanced program rewriting capabilities (in-lining functions, replacing struct members into getter methods, etc)

We have had these for decades, they are called IDEs

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#33

Zed has been on my shortlist as a natively fast text editor to replace Sublime, but I have very little interest in all the AI integration. I'm also not a fan of the prominent "sign in" button at the top right that's completely unhideable - it just serves to remind me that an off-line editor isn't necessarily the goal. These are pretty minor criticisms, and for the most part I really like using it. Additionally, the f…

Editor with a sign-in is insane

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#34

I'd like an editor that uses an open LLM like Lama locally and runs on the Linux desktop. Is this it? Does that exist?

Emacs can do that (there are a couple of add-ons that layer in inference). I believe Neovim can also. On the commercial side IntelliJ and other JetBrains IDEs now have local-inference single-line completion model included. It won't build a project for you (incorrectly... that doesn't compile...), but will help you code faster.

Yes re: Emacs, see gptel:

https://github.com/karthink/gptel

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#35
post #26

I've seen a million and one text editors, and almost all of them offer the feature of being "fast " or "gpu driven" or "cleanly implemented" (now "AI integrated"; LOL). Never features that users actually care about. Perhaps this is just my ego taking, but I think I would struggle to develop such an app. What is the point in programming if you aren't presenting the user with anything new? I suppose the collaborative f…

> How about a text editor which represents code as a syntax tree that is formatted as you type? Or one that has support for embedding multi-media content within source files? Or one with advanced program rewriting capabilities (in-lining functions, replacing struct members into getter methods, etc) We have had these for decades, they are called IDEs

I've not seen many IDEs with the functionality I just listed. Most of the time it's just debugging support and code completion. The idea that most programmers have edited code in the way I just described for decades is patently absurd.

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#36
post #26

I've seen a million and one text editors, and almost all of them offer the feature of being "fast " or "gpu driven" or "cleanly implemented" (now "AI integrated"; LOL). Never features that users actually care about. Perhaps this is just my ego taking, but I think I would struggle to develop such an app. What is the point in programming if you aren't presenting the user with anything new? I suppose the collaborative f…

Performance is extremely important in an editor imo, it changes the whole feel of it. But I don’t even use LSPs now so I may be in the minority

I've been using Emacs for ages. The performance is probably somewhat below average, but I just learned to ignore it. Having better editing features is worth more to me than responsive keyboard input. It would be nice to have both of course, but I don't think switching to a different editor would be worth it for me.

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#37
post #12

God, how often are people gonna post this editor here. I guess you can sell everything as long as it says "AI".

It's a pretty decent editor to be fair. The AI features are probably there to raise money from investors.

If it's so decent why isn't there even a version for Windows....

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#38

I’ve been spending the weekend getting setup in NeoVim and have enjoyed the process so far. It’s definitely not for people who want a plug-and-play IDE, but if you want to see all the programming details that are involved in a text editor (and learn some Lua along the way), then I highly recommend it. Fair warning, it is HIGHLY recommended you come in with a working knowledge of Vim first.

I'd recommend using one of the editor bundles like LazyVim or SpaceVim. I was using Lunarvim and very happy with it, but he's discontinued development on it so I'm planning on moving to LazyVim. After 30+ years of messing around with vi configuration, I'm glad to have someone else doing the bulk of the work.

Hm wish I knew that, I just got set up in LunarVim...

Re: Zed – The Editor for What's Next

#40
I switched to Zed from Sublime a few months ago, and I really like it. Super snappy, doesn't choke, and just pleasant to use.

I don't make any use of the AI features though, and as a solo dev the collaborative aspect is also not useful to me.

Post reply on HN