Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
131–140 of 164 posts
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
How fast do monkeys type?
Just give them a typewriter that records the position of where the key is pressed to a million bits accuracy, convert that to a series of ASCII characters (through a hash function), and the monkeys will type very fast.
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#133Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#134I am biased by my religious beliefs, but I've always struggled with the idea that abiogenesis could spontaneously occur in "just" a few billion years on earth. A few billion seems like not enough time. Even the simplest forms of life are mind bogglingly complex. Of course, it's a few billion years scaled across >1 life-friendly planets (since it only has to happen on 1 of them), but still just seems like not enough m…
This is a very computer science and not scientific response, but I look at the Game of Life, and it makes me realize that little patterns naturally form everywhere. Biology is just a little pattern that wants to replicate and survive and that doesn't have to mean intelligently.
I don't really see biology as being a "little" pattern. To me, looking at the jump from replicating molecules in chemical soup to single cell organisms is like looking at the jump from an abacus to an Intel i9 processor.
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#135For that to happen again, a monkey has to evolve into an intelligent specie interested in human history, find the complete works of Shakespeare, and write it. It is more likely than using probabilistic arguments using letter frequencies, or actual monkeys[1].
[1] https://archive.org/details/NotesTowardsTheCompleteWorksOfSh...
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#136I am biased by my religious beliefs, but I've always struggled with the idea that abiogenesis could spontaneously occur in "just" a few billion years on earth. A few billion seems like not enough time. Even the simplest forms of life are mind bogglingly complex. Of course, it's a few billion years scaled across >1 life-friendly planets (since it only has to happen on 1 of them), but still just seems like not enough m…
Abiogenesis really only need to explain how the first life arose. It could have been really simple since it got out competed by more sophisticated descendant that took over planet and left no trace of original life. We don't know how it happened, if required lots of random chance or if there was a replication step that made if go faster. We know that evolution can make complicated stuff over time.
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#137I am biased by my religious beliefs, but I've always struggled with the idea that abiogenesis could spontaneously occur in "just" a few billion years on earth. A few billion seems like not enough time. Even the simplest forms of life are mind bogglingly complex. Of course, it's a few billion years scaled across >1 life-friendly planets (since it only has to happen on 1 of them), but still just seems like not enough m…
Let's consider a protein of 100 amino acids; although most proteins are in the 200-500 range (IIRC) it makes the maths simpler. Even for such a short sequence, the probability of coming up with one specific sequence at random is incredibly small - 20 to the power of 100 or 1.267651e+130.
The simple answer to this apparent puzzle ('how did proteins evolve from random mutations') is of course that it did not happen like this. Not at all like monkeys typing out scripts and a human checking if they have produced a Shakespeare play yet.
In fact, there are multiple solutions to the same problem - in the analogy, this would be like multiple different versions of the same play being just as good as the other. Even better for evolution, you can - in a sense - put on a version of a play that is pretty bad, but just good enough to put in front of an audience. In other words, some enzymatic functionality can be better than none.
In this way, an evolutionary system can build up complexity by making parts that are _good enough_ and are roughly equivalent to other parts that can be replaced gradually. Combine this with the massive parallelism and the scale of the molecular world, and a billion years can accomplish a lot.
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds to me that the more interesting question would be graphing out the relationship of time and the amount of monkeys needed for one to write Shakespeare.
That's done in the paper. Using a log(log) scale for time, measured in number of heat deaths of the universe. It's the most amusing part of the study.
The figure in question: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277318632...
Re: Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
#139No-one ever said it would happen within a finite time period, only that it would happen given infinite time. That’s the whole point.
Yeah exactly, it's a thought experiment about infinities... Is someone going to publish a study concluding that Hilbert's Hotel couldn't be built on Earth too? Why are people even spending money on this research? What are they trying to prove/disprove?