Live data from Hacker News

Apple's M4 Max chip is the fastest single-core performer in consumer computing

twitter.com

1–10 of 551 posts

Re: Apple's M4 Max chip is the fastest single-core performer in consumer computing

#4
I'll admit to some reflexive skepticism here. I know GeekBench at least used to be considered an entirely unserious indicator of performance and any discussion relating to its scores used to be drowned out by people explaining why it was so bad.

Do those criticisms still hold? Are serious people nowadays taking Geekbench to be a reasonably okay (though obviously imperfect) performance metric?

Re: Apple's M4 Max chip is the fastest single-core performer in consumer computing

#7

I'll admit to some reflexive skepticism here. I know GeekBench at least used to be considered an entirely unserious indicator of performance and any discussion relating to its scores used to be drowned out by people explaining why it was so bad. Do those criticisms still hold? Are serious people nowadays taking Geekbench to be a reasonably okay (though obviously imperfect) performance metric?

You’re not the only one — but just curious where this skepticism comes from.

This is M4 — Apple has now made four generations of chips and each one were class leading upon release. What more do you need to see?

Re: Apple's M4 Max chip is the fastest single-core performer in consumer computing

#9

I'll admit to some reflexive skepticism here. I know GeekBench at least used to be considered an entirely unserious indicator of performance and any discussion relating to its scores used to be drowned out by people explaining why it was so bad. Do those criticisms still hold? Are serious people nowadays taking Geekbench to be a reasonably okay (though obviously imperfect) performance metric?

I'd be reflexively skeptical if I didn't have a M1 Mac. It really is something.

Re: Apple's M4 Max chip is the fastest single-core performer in consumer computing

#10
post #6

Good enough to be used for gaming? Really want Apple to get into that because dealing with Windows sucks.

They’ve always been good enough for gaming. The problem has just been whether or not publishers would bother releasing the games. It’s unfortunate that Apple can’t seem to really build enough momentum here to become a gaming destination.
Post reply on HN