Considering the stocks gain, is it really a loss tho?
Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cutting edge technology. Those Orion smart glasses use a totally novel display using micro-projectors bouncing light through waveguides etched into the silicon carbide lens. The glasses also apparently use 10 custom chips.
Same field of view as years old Magic Leap 2 though. Was Silicon carbide an expensive way to work around ML's patents and get the same FOV?
https://www.magicleap.io/hubfs/ML_22214-104-1.jpeg
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GettyImage...
The magic leap has a much narrower FOV, it's bulkier, and has a wired connection. The Orion are wireless, have a wider FOV, and are slimmer.
Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#13…how?! Can someone smarter than me please do the math and figure out how a company burns through >$17 billion dollars in a single year developing anything?
If you go by the chart at the link, they've lost 54.9 billion dollars since Q4 2020. [1] Do they have any products that can, even in principle, recoup that kind of loss? Is there some kind of tax scheme that can explain this? [1] - From Q1 2020 to the present: (2.1 + 1.83 + 2.43 + 2.63 + 3.3 + 2.96 + 2.81 + 3.67 + 4.28 + 3.99 + 3.74 + 3.74 + 4.65 + 3.85 + 4.49 + 4.43) -- The trend is clearly accelerating. Could build…
Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#14Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#15…how?! Can someone smarter than me please do the math and figure out how a company burns through >$17 billion dollars in a single year developing anything?
Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same field of view as years old Magic Leap 2 though. Was Silicon carbide an expensive way to work around ML's patents and get the same FOV?
No, it's a much wider field of view than the magic leap 2. 45 degrees vs 70 degrees. And more importantly it's in a much smaller form factor. https://www.magicleap.io/hubfs/ML_22214-104-1.jpeg https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GettyImage... The magic leap has a much narrower FOV, it's bulkier, and has a wired connection. The Orion are wireless, have a wider FOV, and are slimmer.
Its lighter, but years newer and not in significant production.
The full wireless and self contained stuff is impressive, but not really tied to the display is it? Maybe more efficient for less battery drain? Do we have numbers on the display power consumption at a given brightness, and is it from the optics or the image source?
Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#17Re: Meta's Reality Labs posts $4.4B loss in third quarter
#18Serious question. WHAT EXACTLY sits in Reality Labs? You can't expect me to believe the oculus vr glasses cost 4.4bn in R&D.