Live data from Hacker News

Standardizing Automotive Connectivity

tesla.com

181–182 of 182 posts

Re: Standardizing Automotive Connectivity

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However Ethernet topology wouldn’t preclude having those on separate buses and linked via switches The topology might not care, but someone designing a trunk latch that communicates via Ethernet might get a visit from an annoyed representative from Value Engineering.

Haha touché. However unintuitive as it may seem an ethernet based trunk latch could be overall cheaper from a system level than a straight relay based system or even CAN system. Especially with the newer two wire ethernet with power via 10BASE-T1S. The connector likely costs more than the ethernet chip, and microprocessors can be had for nickels. So at large manufacturing scale it could easily cost less to share a si…

If costs have dropped to the point that Ethernet is less expensive than LIN, it would definitely be a surprise.

Re: Standardizing Automotive Connectivity

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> better insulation It's very, very hard to get insulation that's not good for at least 100V and I suspect that just about any generic wire is good for more like 300V. The only exception that comes to mind is wire that's specifically for "household low voltage" like 24V AC for thermostat, doorbell, sprinklers, landscape lighting. Also normal ethernet. But these are almost all what you'd call signalling wiring rather…

I was talking about the structural side of things, not the electrical side. I thought this was fairly obvious but I guess not.

It's lighter so is structure such a big issue
Post reply on HN