Live data from Hacker News

Jump Trading, Virtu and the 'hidden optical fibre cable' under an Ohio field

ft.com

1–10 of 77 posts

Re: Jump Trading, Virtu and the 'hidden optical fibre cable' under an Ohio field

#7
post #4

why would a radiowave that is reflected off the atmosphere (and therefore taking the longer route) be faster than a direct fibre cable?

Radio waves travel at nearly the speed of light, whereas light in an fiber optic cable travels at ~67% of the speed of light due to the refractive index of glass.

Re: Jump Trading, Virtu and the 'hidden optical fibre cable' under an Ohio field

#9
post #7
post #4

why would a radiowave that is reflected off the atmosphere (and therefore taking the longer route) be faster than a direct fibre cable?

Radio waves travel at nearly the speed of light, whereas light in an fiber optic cable travels at ~67% of the speed of light due to the refractive index of glass.

Ericsson blog wrote:

In a vacuum, electro-magnetic waves travel at a speed of 3.336 microseconds (μs) per kilometer (km). Through the air, that speed is a tiny fraction slower, clocking in at 3.337 μs per km, while through a fiber-optic cable it takes 4.937 μs to travel one kilometer – this means that microwave transport is actually 48% faster than fiber-optic, all other things being equal.

Re: Jump Trading, Virtu and the 'hidden optical fibre cable' under an Ohio field

#10
post #8
post #4

why would a radiowave that is reflected off the atmosphere (and therefore taking the longer route) be faster than a direct fibre cable?

Light doesn’t go at light speed through optical fiber.

By definition, it does, because the maximum speed is qualified by "the speed of light in a vacuum", so the speed of light [in other media] is simply a function of how much the medium slows it down, yet it is still the speed of light. Funny how that works!
Post reply on HN