Live data from Hacker News

Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

shepherd.com

231–240 of 317 posts

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#231
The most unusual book I read this year is Radiance by Catherynne Valente.

It's set in an Art-Deco "future" of our fully habitable Solar system (jungles and oceans on Venus, flowering fields on Pluto, etc), that started to be colonized in the 1860s. Of course, it is a play on early science fiction tropes, but somehow, it all fits together.

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#232
Just because they're both books that are hard to stumble upon and are a bit out of the usual recommendations, and yet everyone I have recommended them to have /deeply/ enjoyed them:

"Constellation Games" by Leonard Richardson (also known for the Beautiful Soup Python library!) https://constellation.crummy.com/

"Happy Snak" by Nicole Kimberling https://www.nicolekimberling.com/happy-snak

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#233

Here are some which, though perhaps not the best, haunt my memory through unique nostalgia. Glory Season , David Brin. Ok, this is one of the best. A heartrending saga of epic scale. Carve the Sky , Alexander Jablokov. Scifi feudalism. All of an Instant , Richard Garfinkle. Vita Nostra , Marina & Sergey Dyachenko. Though very different, it somehow reminds me of Roadside Picnic . Spin , Robert Charles Wilson. Schismat…

>Vita Nostra, Marina & Sergey Dyachenko

That's far from their best novel, but unfortunately most aren't translated into English - there're Polish and sometimes Deutsch translations only :(

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#234

Greg Egan. Agree with others in this thread that Permutation City is the most important. But Diaspora is not to be missed either. Egan's unique value prop is: crazy-thought-experiment sci fi (2D world with 2 time dimensions is his latest and is typical) but hard, harder than you can believe. Sci fi so hard, you don't find any cracks and are left thinking wait a minute ... This must be true then? Gene Wolfe. Book of t…

Egan is quite active on Mastodon. Toots about science and maths among other things and I gotta say, some of the math stuff he works on seems quite impressive (to me at least).

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#236
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love the Wandering Inn but calling it “a bit longish” is quite an understatement.

Ok it's a bit longer, only a little bit. See for yourself https://www.reddit.com/r/WanderingInn/comments/wil9pi/word_c...

OT, but I'm legitimately surprised that WoT is longer than the saga of recluse.

I'm also a very mildly annoyed that they included several era-spanning series on the list, but limited Dragonlance to the chronicles trillogy, despite that including followups by the original authors (Legends, Second generations).

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#237
post #142

The Wandering Inn [1], Stories of an alternate world somehow connected to a certain innkeeper of the said inn. Features extensive world building, character building, Lots of fleshed out characters, contains humour as well as serious stuff, has dragons, fae, aliens, time travel, hiveminds, automatons, cute pets, cosmic horrors, history lessons, magic, alchemy and steampunk engineering. It's a bit longish and not finis…

I'm only on the second volume, but so far I wouldn't call it Sci-Fi; it's pretty much straight-up fantasy (specifically a portal-fantasy with string LitRPG elements) so far.

I suppose there could be a "It's all a VR game" or "It's alien mind control" twist that I haven't gotten to yet.

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#239

No mention of Peter Watts' Blindsight? That book changed all sorts of notions of first contact and consciousness for me. I'm still thinking about it to this day. Absolute must read for anyone concerned with such things

> No mention of Peter Watts' Blindsight? It was a Hugo nominee and actively reprinted under Tor Essentials label; probably doesn't qualify as a book "you may never have heard of"...but to be fair, anything by Andy Weir or Hugh Howey probably shouldn't have made the list either.

>probably doesn't qualify as a book "you may never have heard of"

That's most of the ones being mentioned in this thread. I think maybe they are scifi books you haven't heard of...if you also don't normally read scifi.

Re: Sci-fi books that you may never have heard of, but definitely should read

#240
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah it's implausible. I mean, I don't think his genetics is right. So it's probably physically possible in some sense, but I don't it makes sense that it's that stable of a trait.

I think his explanation was that right angles don't appear in nature so the trait didn't get selected out.

>I think his explanation was that right angles don't appear in nature

Which is weird, because they do.

Post reply on HN