Live data from Hacker News

Should JavaScript be split into two languages?

devclass.com

321–324 of 324 posts

Re: Should JavaScript be split into two languages?

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ECMA not Ecma Incorrect: https://ecma-international.org/about-ecma/history/

Cool: my comment is about them spelling it wrong, writing it as "emca".

Also, it did start life as an acronym, and that spelling perdures in the hated "ECMAScript" name.

Re: Should JavaScript be split into two languages?

#322
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess is that none of those bytecode VMs were designed with the explicit goal of running untrusted code at global scale in a rock-solid sandbox. If anything, I expect those existing VMs to slowly be replaced by WebAssembly due to how crucial and complicated that very specific sandbox requirement is - and how useful that is once you have it working reliably. Personally I never want to run untrusted code on any of m…

From the day WebAssembly was announced: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9732827 The Web is an evolving system too large and long-lived for any single company, stable consortium, or standards body capable of doing the deed to do it, so none of Java, Flash (AVM), .NET/CLR, NaCl/PNaCl, Dart, and others I have forgotten about ever had a chance to take over. JS got out first and evolved through several jumps into htt…

On why no extant 1995 language and why no bytecode:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1905155

https://kripken.github.io/talks/2020/universal.html#/ (from Alon Zakai in 2020)

Re: Should JavaScript be split into two languages?

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ECMA not Ecma Incorrect: https://ecma-international.org/about-ecma/history/

Cool: my comment is about them spelling it wrong, writing it as "emca".

Oh, duh! Good catch! Apologies!

Re: Should JavaScript be split into two languages?

#324

"ECMA TC39", not "Emca TC39". Also, looks like a bad markup link for TC39. Also note that it's either "co-authored by Mozilla, Apple, Moddable and Sony" or "authored by Guo along with others from Mozilla, Apple, Moddable and Sony", but directly related to that statement, that makes this "not a Google proposal" but clearly an "industry proposal" if it has Mozilla and Apple buy-in. Also, "the proposed solution is not t…

Moving features out of the core (JS0) would break backwards compatibility and therefore many existing sites.
Post reply on HN