Earlier quoted context omitted.
…yes it does make sense? They’re complying within the rules fully, but if they decide the rules are too onerous or compromising on their core mission, the legally correct thing to do is to take their ball and go home. The rest of us not in India don’t want to be affected by the rulings of a Delhi court. If the citizens of India don’t like this outcome, it’s up to them to fix it.
Agreed. Nothing wrong with it. I was just trying to fully understand what the other commenter said. If following the law is such a burden on them then they should by all means pack up and leave. This is also what the Delhi High Court said after Wikipedia chose to ignore its order. This applies to all western institutions and corporations. If the expectation is that, Indian courts and the Indian public should continue…
That's a pretty aggressive stance on this that is not warranted. Wikipedia is pursuing its mission of providing an uncensored source of information created by an open community for the public. Posing the situation as aggressively as you have makes it seem as if you are the one trying to make someone or something "bend over" (or whatever gross turn of phrase you'd like to use).