OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
1–10 of 67 posts
Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#2How much does the flagd sidecar cost? Seems like that could be a lot of overhead for this one bit of functionality.
Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#3Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#4java version embeds lombok symbols lol
Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#5Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#6Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#7Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#8Where is the tldr? Anyone familiar…what does this do and why do we care about it being standards based?
Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#9java version embeds lombok symbols lol
Forgive my ignorance, but what should it be doing instead?
Given that, it's a bold choice to include Lombok in a library that other developers will pull into their stack - it's likely to make this a non-starter from those in the 'no' camp.
As Lombok is just compiler sugar, when building an SDK for other developers, it's probably less alienating to just write the boilerplate that Lombok saves you from.
Re: OpenFeature – a vendor-agnostic, community-driven API for feature flagging
#10Where is the tldr? Anyone familiar…what does this do and why do we care about it being standards based?
i.e., using feature flag SaaS ABC but want to try out XYZ? if you’re using ABC’s own DDK, refactor your codebase.
I appreciate that you can use the OpenFeature SDK with environment variables, and move into a SaaS (or custom) solution when you’re ready.