The new Sonnet tops aider's code editing leaderboard at 84.2%. Using aider's "architect" mode it sets the SOTA at 85.7% (with DeepSeek as the "editor" model). 84% Claude 3.5 Sonnet 10/22 80% o1-preview 77% Claude 3.5 Sonnet 06/20 72% DeepSeek V2.5 72% GPT-4o 08/06 71% o1-mini 68% Claude 3 Opus It also sets SOTA on aider's more demanding refactoring benchmark with a score of 92.1%! 92% Sonnet 10/22 75% o1-preview 72%…
Anecdotally but I still get significantly better results from ChatGPT than claude for coding. Claude is way less controllable it is difficult to get it to do exactly what I want. ChatGPT is way easier to control in terms of asking for specific changes. Not sure why that is maybe the chain of thought and instruction tuning dataset has made theirs a lot better for interactive use.
Example; I asked it to write some js that finds a button on a page, clicks the button, then waits for a new element with some selector to appear and return a ref to it; chatgpt kept returning (pseudo code);
while (true) {
button.click()
wait()
oldItems = ...
newItems = ...
newItem = newItems - oldItems
if (newItem) return newItem
sleep(1)
}
which obviously doesn't work. Claude understands to put the oldItems outside the while; even when I tell chatgpt to do that, it doesn't. Or it does one time and with another change, it moves it back in.