Great progress from Anthropic! They really shouldn't change models from under the hood, however. A name should refer to a specific set of model weights, more or less. On the other hand, as long as its actually advancing the Pareto frontier of capability, re-using the same name means everyone gets an upgrade with no switching costs. Though, all said, Claude still seems to be somewhat of an insider secret. "ChatGPT" ha…
Traveling to the US recently, I was surprised to see Claude ads around the city/in the airport. It seems like they're investing on marketing there. In my country I've never seen anyone mention them at all.
Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
91–100 of 758 posts
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#92Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#93The barrier to scraping youtube has increased a lot recently, I can barely use yt-dlp anymore
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#94---
Some thoughts:
* Will be interesting to see what we can build in terms of automatic development loops with the new computer use capabilities.
* I wonder if they are not releasing Opus because it's not done or because they don't have enough inference compute to go around, and Sonnet is close enough to state of the art?
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#95Completely irrelevant, and it might just be me, but I really like Anthropic's understated branding. OpenAI's branding isn't exactly screaming in your face either, but for something that's generated as much public fear/scaremongering/outrage as LLMs have over the last couple of years, Anthropic's presentation has a much "cosier" veneer to my eyes. This isn't the Skynet Terminator wipe-us-all-out AI, it's the adorable…
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#96Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#97Is there an easy way to use Claude as a Co-Pilot in VS Code? If it is better at coding, it would be great to have it integrated.
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#98Is there an easy way to use Claude as a Co-Pilot in VS Code? If it is better at coding, it would be great to have it integrated.
For Cursor-like use (giving prompts and letting it create and modify files across the project), Cline – previously Claude Dev – is pretty good.
Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku
#99- "computer use" is basically using Claude's vision + tool use capability in a loop. There's a reference impl but there's no "claude desktop" app that just comes with this OOTB
- they're basically advertising that they bumped up Claude 3.5's screen vision capability. we discussed the importance of this general computer agent approach with David on our pod https://x.com/swyx/status/1771255525818397122
- @minimaxir points out questions on cost. Note that the vision use is very sparing - the loop is I/O constrained - it waits for the tool to run and then takes a screenshot, then loops. for a simple 10 loop task at max resolution, Haiku costs - beating o1-preview on SWEbench Verified without extended reasoning and at 4x cheaper output per token (a lot cheaper in total tokens since no reasoning tokens) is ABSOLUTE mogging
- New 3.5 Haiku is 68% cheaper than Claude Instant haha
references i had to dig a bit to find
- https://www.anthropic.com/pricing#anthropic-api
- https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/vision#...
- loop code https://github.com/anthropics/anthropic-quickstarts/blob/mai...
- some other screenshots https://x.com/swyx/status/1848751964588585319
- https://x.com/alexalbert__/status/1848743106063306826
- model card https://assets.anthropic.com/m/1cd9d098ac3e6467/original/Cla...