I can swear something like 20+ years ago I found a new one too, but I didn’t realize the importance of it. I had just downloaded GIMPS and I was just messing around with it, and when I saw the message I thought “ok, cool!” and proceeded to turn it off.
New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
11–20 of 126 posts
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#12Why don't they say what it is?
Because the EFF Cooperative Computing Awards for the first discovery of large enough prime numbers are still active. Publishing the probable prime in advance would risk someone verifying faster than GIMPS.
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the EFF Cooperative Computing Awards for the first discovery of large enough prime numbers are still active. Publishing the probable prime in advance would risk someone verifying faster than GIMPS.
It's hard to see how that someone would count as the discoverer.
(And I think it is technically possible to probe the reports to find what it was anyway, but it is not easy to find one at least for me. If you are really looking for that, look for the P-PRP result type.)
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#14Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#15Chuck Norris has already discovered and factorized all the prime numbers.
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the EFF Cooperative Computing Awards for the first discovery of large enough prime numbers are still active. Publishing the probable prime in advance would risk someone verifying faster than GIMPS.
It's hard to see how that someone would count as the discoverer.
NP hard?
I wonder why?
:)
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#17I can swear something like 20+ years ago I found a new one too, but I didn’t realize the importance of it. I had just downloaded GIMPS and I was just messing around with it, and when I saw the message I thought “ok, cool!” and proceeded to turn it off.
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's hard to see how that someone would count as the discoverer.
That someone will totally count as the discoverer under the current rules [1], because it requires the deterministic primality proof for given number. It doesn't matter how much effort was taken to reach that candidate so far, even though it would be virtually impossible to find any new prime without that. I think the temporary embargo is fully justified for this reason. (And I think it is technically possible to pro…
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#19I can swear something like 20+ years ago I found a new one too, but I didn’t realize the importance of it. I had just downloaded GIMPS and I was just messing around with it, and when I saw the message I thought “ok, cool!” and proceeded to turn it off.
It would have cost a little under 95$ to have played all my numbers (for a jackpot around $1.5M) I gave him however it would have taken a lot of effort to manually enter them. My father just does one page because it is silly. The numbers are silly, everything about this is silly. I completely understand in hindsight. But it turned out page 7 had the winning combination.
Re: New Mersenne Prime discovered (probably)
#20Chuck Norris has already discovered and factorized all the prime numbers.