Live data from Hacker News

#BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

plus.google.com

331–340 of 374 posts

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Galaxy Nexus doesn't use / have that.

I'm not saying it does. I'm saying Samsung has no shame in copying this closely.

Neither did Steve Jobs. What's your point?

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple Legal is at odds with Apple Engineering, trying to litigate away the competition instead of innovating past them I don't even... what do you expect Apple Legal to innovate? "Accept EULA to unlock?" They aren't at odds with engineering any more than having a good defense is at odds with having a good offense. Have you used an up-to-date android phone in the last 6 months? Perhaps even gotten to play with an Nexu…

> Is this particular patent valid? Maybe, maybe not... it doesn't really matter. Are you shitting me ??? They just got two of their competitors' flagship products banned from sale over that bullshit patent, which will likely take years to invalidate. What on earth makes you think it "doesn't matter"?

[deleted]

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#336
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it irrelevant? Consumers should not support companies which engage in crooked anticompetitive behavior. Our choices should be based on something more than how they treat consumers. It's like "blood diamonds". They might be all nice and sparkling, but really stained in blood. Do you think it's enough to look just at the external value? It's not enough. It's good to vote with your wallet, boycotting companies wh…

Using Blood Diamonds as an example is offensive. The two are no where close to related nor should be reference when speaking about each other. All companies engage in crooked anti-competitive behavior. Samsung is not excluded from the list and one of the reasons that this thread exist. Our choices should always be about how companies treat people, not just consumers of their products.

It's offensive enough to show disrespect towards unethical business practices in which Apple engages (such as abusing patent law for anticompetitive purposes).

> Our choices should always be about how companies treat people

That's correct. That's why companies which promote lock in, stifle innovation with software patents abuse, and etc. cause damage to society. I.e. they treat people badly, for the sake of their profit.

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#337
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it irrelevant? Consumers should not support companies which engage in crooked anticompetitive behavior. Our choices should be based on something more than how they treat consumers. It's like "blood diamonds". They might be all nice and sparkling, but really stained in blood. Do you think it's enough to look just at the external value? It's not enough. It's good to vote with your wallet, boycotting companies wh…

Using Blood Diamonds as an example is offensive. The two are no where close to related nor should be reference when speaking about each other. All companies engage in crooked anti-competitive behavior. Samsung is not excluded from the list and one of the reasons that this thread exist. Our choices should always be about how companies treat people, not just consumers of their products.

> Samsung is not excluded from the list and one of the reasons that this thread exist.

I'm not following every single example, but when did Samsung exactly act as patent aggressor? Most cases that come to mind were in defense to others aggressive patent threats (namely Apple's). Apple doesn't hesitate to act as patent aggressor on the other hand. There is a difference between defensive attack, and outright aggression.

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#338
post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>the patent that Microsoft is suing OEM's with is related to ActiveSync Can you provide citation for the above? As far as I know, neither Microsoft nor any of the Android H/W manufacturers have revealed any details on which patents are covered as part of the licensing agreement.

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/Microsoft-Wins-...

That article is about a law suit involving motorola; not a license agreement MS has with several companies including Samsung & HTC. What about these other Android companies that have got license agreements with Microsoft? They have never publicly talked about patents covered by the agreement.

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#339
post #63

Google would do the same if they were in Apple's position. So boycotting does not make sense.

That is clearly untrue. When Apple wanted to make a phone they made their ecosystem a jail cell. When Google was in the same position and wanted to make a phone, they started the Open Handset Alliance, and developed free software for manufactures and consumers to use and modify as they see fit. How exactly is that doing the same thing?

I cannot upvote this enough.

I for one will never buy another iPhone. But I am in a jail cell. How can I leave iOS? My friend tried once and it bit him in the ass. He lost his iPhone (which never had iOS 5 and thus never had iMessage). But at some point between losing his phone and disabling his sim card, the person who stole/had his phone upgraded to iOS 5 and turned on iMessage. So his stolen/lost phone was now taking all his iMessages. My friend then bought a non-Apple phone and NONE of his friends (including me) that were using iPhones were able to text him. We received messages from him, but all our replies were being sent as iMessages to his stolen/lost phone. He had to change his phone number in the end. Who designs this shit?

Re: #BoycottApple trending on Google plus due to Galaxy Nexus ban

#340

Wow that live stream update is a nightmare - I keep trying to read what's happened and things get pushed down almost immediately. A clickable (or w/e) "18 new posts" would make it usable.

To save you the trouble, it's a stream of content free fanboyism and witless photoshoppery. Every single comment would be downvoted to oblivion if it were posted here.

What do you expect from douchetag users? http://goldmanosi.blogspot.com/2012/02/douchetag.html
Post reply on HN