Live data from Hacker News

AI PCs Aren't Good at AI: The CPU Beats the NPU

github.com

1–10 of 303 posts

Re: AI PCs Aren't Good at AI: The CPU Beats the NPU

#8
These NPUs are tying up a substantial amount of silicon area so it would be a real shame if they end up not being used for much. I can't find a die analysis of the Snapdragon X which isolates the NPU specifically but AMDs equivalent with the same ~50 TOPS performance target can be seen here, and takes up about as much area as three high performance CPU cores:

https://www.techpowerup.com/325035/amd-strix-point-silicon-p...

Re: AI PCs Aren't Good at AI: The CPU Beats the NPU

#9
> the 45 trillion operations per second that’s listed in the specs

Such a spec should be ideally be accompanied by code demonstrating or approximating the claimed performance. I can't imagine a sports car advertising a 0-100km/h spec of 2.0 seconds where a user is unable to get below 5 seconds.

Re: AI PCs Aren't Good at AI: The CPU Beats the NPU

#10
post #5

In general MAC unit utilization tends to be low for transformers, but 1.3% seems pretty bad. I wonder if they fucked up the memory interface for the NPU. All the MACs in the world are useless if you cannot feed them.

I recall looking over the Ryzen AI architecture and the NPU is just plugged into PCIe and thus gets completely crap memory bandwidth. I would expect it might be similar here.
Post reply on HN