Passed 3-2 along party lines. Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
How could ANYBODY vote against this?
As coldpie said:
> Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
(high empathy justice sensitive human)
21–30 of 793 posts
Passed 3-2 along party lines. Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
How could ANYBODY vote against this?
As coldpie said:
> Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
(high empathy justice sensitive human)
Does the FTC actually have the power to set rules like this effectively now that Chevron deference isn't a thing? I'd imagine e.g. the New York Times, among others, will quickly sue to stop this, no?
Honestly, this is the best thing if it changes the worst experience I've had cancelling something - Gyms. They make it crazy easy to sign up, but a pain in the ass to stop being a member (for example, if you move and forget to cancel good luck - they want you to come in and talk to the manager in a lot of cases)
How did it even evolve into such a mess? Cannot you just go to random gym, pay for enterance and do ya thing without signing stuff?
Does the FTC actually have the power to set rules like this effectively now that Chevron deference isn't a thing? I'd imagine e.g. the New York Times, among others, will quickly sue to stop this, no?
[0] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/holyoak-dissent...
Passed 3-2 along party lines. Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
Does the FTC actually have the power to set rules like this effectively now that Chevron deference isn't a thing? I'd imagine e.g. the New York Times, among others, will quickly sue to stop this, no?
NYTimes already allows cancelling online for most subscriptions, so I imagine this won't be a big issue for them.
Does the FTC actually have the power to set rules like this effectively now that Chevron deference isn't a thing? I'd imagine e.g. the New York Times, among others, will quickly sue to stop this, no?
NYTimes already allows cancelling online for most subscriptions, so I imagine this won't be a big issue for them.
If your reaction is wondering if this is legal then you should be interested in the passing of new laws that make it unequivocally legal. Society should be able to govern itself.
Honestly, this is the best thing if it changes the worst experience I've had cancelling something - Gyms. They make it crazy easy to sign up, but a pain in the ass to stop being a member (for example, if you move and forget to cancel good luck - they want you to come in and talk to the manager in a lot of cases)
Seems silly to just accept virtually un-cancellable terms.