Live data from Hacker News

Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

code.google.com

1–10 of 96 posts

Re: Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

#2
Looks sweet.

I currently have to use Windows at the customer I'm working for. I've installed Console which gives tabs and better copy-n-paste on Windows. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/

I'm not sure if clink and Console will work together, but I'll have to try it.

Re: Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

#3
post #2

Looks sweet. I currently have to use Windows at the customer I'm working for. I've installed Console which gives tabs and better copy-n-paste on Windows. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/ I'm not sure if clink and Console will work together, but I'll have to try it.

I use console too and it's awesome. I love the tabs and the transparency feature.

Re: Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

#8
post #2

Looks sweet. I currently have to use Windows at the customer I'm working for. I've installed Console which gives tabs and better copy-n-paste on Windows. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/ I'm not sure if clink and Console will work together, but I'll have to try it.

Console2 regularly crashes on my Windows 7, and it looks like it's not actively developed.

I'm giving ConEmu a try and it looks awesome!

http://code.google.com/p/conemu-maximus5/

Scott Hanselman wrote a blog post about it:

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ConEmuTheWindowsTerminalConsol...

Re: Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

#9
post #7

just use cygwin

I feel like cygwin manages to combine the worst of UNIX and the worst of Windows. And the commands that use the cygwin runtime are noticeably slower than the native counterparts.

Also, AFAIK there is no 64bit version yet, which for me is a dealbreaker (I often work with files larger than 2GB).

Re: Bringing Bash's powerful command line editing to Microsoft Windows' cmd.exe

#10
post #9
post #7

just use cygwin

I feel like cygwin manages to combine the worst of UNIX and the worst of Windows. And the commands that use the cygwin runtime are noticeably slower than the native counterparts. Also, AFAIK there is no 64bit version yet, which for me is a dealbreaker (I often work with files larger than 2GB).

I'm with you there -- I find Cygwin starts slow and unstable, and then seems to rot at an astonishing speed, to the point where it's usually unusable after I've had it installed for a couple of months.
Post reply on HN