> A lot of the comments seem to call out Matt (right or wrong). But that’s the easy thing to do.
It's also productive. If there's enough of an uproar, then the board will remove him. They're pretty much the only people who can stop him.
> There is a social contract that people should contribute back, and while it’s largely unenforceable, as it should be, when it’s happening on a systemic level something has to be done. And we are all complicit if we don’t at least say that much and spare some good will towards the guy actively in that fight at least superficially
You don't speak for me. Contributions to my OSS projects are appreciated, but all I ask is that users comply with the license terms.
If you feel that contributions are an unwritten obligation, he's made them much harder to ask for. Everyone else who asks for them in the future will be tarred with the same brush.
Matt is burning down the WordPress ecosystem because his shakedown attempt failed. He's prevented at least 2.5 million users from receiving security updates. He's earned my contempt, not my goodwill.
> I might agree with most of your points, I’m just trying to get people to realize there’s the local issue of Matt/wp and then there’s this global issue of companies building businesses off foss and not giving back.
Drew said it best. (https://drewdevault.com/2021/01/20/FOSS-is-to-surrender-your...) If you want to require contributions, pick an appropriate license.