Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#2Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#3The title was so confusing to me, the reason I opened the link was to understand how you made the SSH tunnel manager learn the GO programming language
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#4Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#5Nice project! I would advise to use $XDG_CONFIG_HOME instead of $HOME for storing the configuration file though :)
Basically, I want app/kinds-of-data and not the other way around.
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#6Nice project! I would advise to use $XDG_CONFIG_HOME instead of $HOME for storing the configuration file though :)
I hate XDG stuff so much. I just wish every app had their own folder in which they can put whatever they want. If home directory clutter is the issue, then just ~/crap/.{app1,..n} can be standardised. Basically, I want app/kinds-of-data and not the other way around.
Don't get me wrong -- some of the choices made by the XDG/FreeDesktop folks rub me the wrong way too ...
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#7Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#8Nice work! SSH tunnels can be a pain, so this looks handy. What was the toughest part of building it in Go? Any features you’re thinking of adding?
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#9The title was so confusing to me, the reason I opened the link was to understand how you made the SSH tunnel manager learn the GO programming language
I don't think "I made X to do Y" ever means "I made X do Y" does it?
Re: Show HN: I made an SSH tunnel manager to learn Go
#10Nice project! I would advise to use $XDG_CONFIG_HOME instead of $HOME for storing the configuration file though :)
I hate XDG stuff so much. I just wish every app had their own folder in which they can put whatever they want. If home directory clutter is the issue, then just ~/crap/.{app1,..n} can be standardised. Basically, I want app/kinds-of-data and not the other way around.